| Joined: | Thu Apr 19th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4428 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Robert, you crack me up!
I think that the old addage of whatever gets the job done well is the key.
What works for one is sub-optimal for another.
If your images are sharp and correctly exposed then how you got there is immaterial unless you are in a race!
I agree to a degree, but in the interests of continuing the debate...do you not feel it's a slippy slope? There's thin line between 'fit for purpose' and 'good enough'.
I just took some kitchen photos for a customer. ( yes I have retired but it was a series of 6 kitchens that should have been finished and done before April) The customer ( who makes and fits the kitchens) came back with an email saying "STUNNING IMAGES!". They were over the moon with the quality.
I thought they were average ...in fact ....part of me was already saying †I've retired...so if they are no good, what the heck, they just won't ask me again...good!â€
The point is ...taking images to meet an average albeit acceptable standard doesn't do us any favours.
____________________
Eric