View single post by jk
 Posted: Fri May 4th, 2012 02:02
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
Yes that is a good way of not introducing too many rubbish artifacts into the image.

Fortunately we have the NEF to use as a unedited starting point. I really cant understand why anyone would choose to convert to DNG and and throw away the original unless you are fooled by the Adobe speak. DNG is just another type of RAW file.

This is an excellent thread I found the other day.
http://www.openraw.org/node/1482/

Thomas Knoll from Adobe give the case for and the original poster argues against it.
I know which side I support. Sorry Thomas Knoll you may be clever but sometimes you are too much so and cant see the wood for the trees.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none