View single post by jk
 Posted: Thu Jan 7th, 2016 16:37
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6829
Status: 
Offline
amazing50 wrote: Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:

So, are you saying that the old wisdom of ...the smaller the pixels, the poorer the low light quality....is still correct?


I think it's more involved than just pixel size, processors and software do a lot more now days.
Look at the D1, huge pixels but poor hi ISO.

I agree it is more than just the sensor (12MP v. 16MP v 21MP) and its pixel size and the support electronics (EXPEED version 3, 4, 5) as the the software also comes into play.

This is exemplified with the Fuji X series cameras all the same sensor (more or less).  Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop ACR  still cant beat the solutions offered in other RAW softwares.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none