View single post by Robert
 Posted: Sat Jul 16th, 2016 13:55
Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Hi Dillon, and welcome to the forum. I have the D3100 and am evaluating a D3300, I have the 18-105 Gilbert mentions and would concur with his advice. Its a very good lens, head and shoulders above the 18-55.

However your question is about the 18-55, I don't own that lens and am unlikely to, but all I can say is the VR feature isn't one I would seek. For lenses under 200mm it's pretty much pointless even for a doddery old codger like myself.

I regard the D3xxx cameras as my lightweight 'snapshot' cameras and use them for hiking and family photography. For serious photography I don't own any VR lens, nor would I ever bother seeking out a lens for it's VR capability.

I suppose if you feel VR is important then, perhaps the later version may have some virtues. However, as I have said, for short focal lengths VR is not an important consideration, even for a 105mm in my opinion. I have many images taken at 105mm f2.5, which are perfectly sharp with no AF or VR.

You don't mention your general location in your profile so am unable to help with that specific.



____________________
Robert.