| Joined: | Thu Apr 19th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4428 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
That would be my thought as well. Some people would say that the 18-135 is large and obtrusive.
I suppose it depends what 'urban' photography means in this context.
If it's taking buildings, signage and such general static objects, size doesn't matter....apart from maybe the issue of weight.
If the intention is to shoot candid people photos, then perhaps less obtrusive equipment might be an advantage.
Of course, 18mm isn't that wide. So adding a Sigma 10-20 or the like, could add another dimension.
I still think spending on a camera body would be more beneficial.
____________________
Eric