| Joined: | Mon Aug 13th, 2012 |
| Location: | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Posts: | 442 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Interesting interview with Tetsuru Goto , yet he`s Not saying if the camera`s will replace the Big D `s.
I could say that I am catered for , as the D3s - D3X are Everything I want and more...and yet..
A lightweight , smaller , 20 f-stop dynamic range , affordable camera could be interesting.
But why do away with the mirror ?...why not omit the mechanical shutter ?
The D1 has a hybrid Mechanical/ Electronic shutter , so now twenty years later , Nikon may have Perfected that , no more " rolling " f.ex.
Look, the old F is a small-ish camera , yet has a mirror Larger than it`s contemporaries, even a 500mm would fill the 100 prcent screen without mirror cut-off.
So the mirror box is Not what makes a camera BIG.
Video could be a factor for mirrorless , my D3S has video , with mirror-up tho`, therefore only rear monitor can be used, it`s a pain..
So for video I use my phone.
But Tetsuro Goto is saying No video on that FullFrame mirrorless.
So I`m guessing that the new camera is an Addition to the Big D line.
What are your thoughts on this ?
____________________
Back in Danmark
I do not use my equipment to make photo`s .. I take photo`s to use my equipment
The better I become at photography,the better my camera gets.