View single post by Eric
 Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2018 10:22
Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4428
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Graham, it might be useful if you could detail the steps you took to improve the image.
XMP file would be useful.


With respect, we should be able to take photsos that don't need rescuing with computers. That was the thrust of my argument.

o.O

All the images I posted have had NO digital witchcraft applied.

There are many ways that visible noise or jpegging artefacts can be reduced. They all achieve this by some degree of image softening. That can't be right? We spend thousands of pounds on the finest optical equipment only to soften the images to hide noise?

I have my own selective noise reduction method (reposted image below). Although it only takes a couple of minutes....it's time I would rather not have to spend masking sensor limitations.

Attachment: ED4CC8BE-EFBE-4121-A09B-8012FB893A76.jpeg (Downloaded 10 times)

Last edited on Wed Dec 12th, 2018 11:17 by Eric



____________________
Eric