| Joined: | Thu Apr 19th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4435 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I've just looked back at my recent egret and wader images and now feel I've made the birds too large in the frame. It's made me wonder about something Mike said to me that his best images are 1/3 bird 2/3 habitat.
Maybe a bit of post rationalisation on his part, not having the tele reach we have, but I do feel there is some truth in the relative framing.
It's a bit like these big tvs.....if the close up shots of peoples faces are bigger than real life when sitting in normal viewing position, they take on a more invasive aggressive feel.
Not saying your kingfisher is aggressive 😆
Would be interested in views about bird size v habitat contribution to framing.
Last edited on Thu Jan 3rd, 2019 05:07 by Eric
____________________
Eric