View single post by novicius
 Posted: Wed Sep 18th, 2019 23:09
novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
 If Nikon would make one, Price aside , I would still be on the fence , as either ,..focal range is not that interesting at f2.0,...if it was f1.4 or faster I would save up for one...Or...if it was at 35-100 f2.0,...and the price was Not more than 2000,- usd.

Why that PC 17 f4.0.....because of foc.length or `cause it`s a Canon ? ( I have noticed there are those that consider Canon`s PC glass to be superior to that of Nikon )

Personally, the Nikkor PC-E 19 f4.0 is of interest, but the price...as it is , the 14-24 kept Level on the D3X  at No higher than 400 iso with cropping aplied in NX-D,  is a workable substitute when shown in A3 format,perhaps even in A2 format ( have n`t tried A2 yet ).

Going the Extreme route...there`s the LAOWA Venus PC 15 f4.5...something I consider myself...saw some examples that looked Convincing.

I remember you being a fellow 14-24 owner,so..why the Canon ?

Last edited on Wed Sep 18th, 2019 23:11 by novicius



____________________
Back in Danmark

I do not use my equipment to make photo`s .. I take photo`s to use my equipment

The better I become at photography,the better my camera gets.