| Joined: | Wed Apr 18th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4186 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Eric wrote:
I think you are overlooking that one of the reasons the D200 and D2X were so close was they shared the same DX sensor. This wasn't the case with the D3 and D300.
The D300 DX sensor was never going to approach its FX big brother in image performance. It was the D700 that was 98% of the D3
Eric, I totally agree but explaining why something is doesn't negate it. At the end of the day it's just my personal opinion, and not on anything important!
I remember your comments when the D300 came out and it certainly has been a long wait but I remain hopeful for a strong D400 offering. (not that I plan to get one, but I would like to see it regardless).
I did convert my D200 to IR rather thn the D300. Maybe that's a subliminal agreement with you
____________________
Eric