View single post by Eric
 Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 14:07
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
Ok…because I know Graham will be doing a talk/workshop on Photoshop AI, I’m going to be a bit nit picking to help in his pros and cons.

Firstly the crashing sea and the ‘cartoon’ man on the rocks.

There are 3 or 4 things that disturb me with this images. 
The Beluga whale like wave crashing into the mid distant rocks with no spray.
The strange choice of figure on the rocks …it doesn’t look real let alone realistic.
The white (sharpening?) halo around high contrast edges….is it selecting low res files and trying to make them bigger and better?
I am uncomfortable with the sea transitions. The tide in the middle foreground seems to be a different energy to the water by the rocks on the right. 
The mid distant sea just looks to yet another energy level to the rest of the water. It looks like a merged version of several images???

In the sunset image…

Here again there is a halo around high contrast edges???
It may be a single image but I am again disturbed by what seems like disjoined energy in the water. It’s almost as though it’s two images at different shutter speeds and merged.
And what’s going on with those 3 black rocks above mid rocks? They don’t look real?


Autumn trees on a hillside….

I thought that was quite good apart from yet again ….halos, the 3 strange periscopes and the black ‘Sanskrit like’ marks to the left of the main rock?/


Apart from image ownership, what is the difference in asking PS to provide such an image, as opposed to asking google to do the same same?
Are Adobe just gathering royalty free images and merging where necessary?




Click here to comment on this image.

Last edited on Tue Nov 7th, 2023 14:07 by



____________________
Eric