| Joined: | Sun Aug 12th, 2012 |
| Location: | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Posts: | 434 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I started this thread about my wondering about photogs migrating to the " Z " system,but then leaving it again,...but to where?
Granted,I do not know all the others,but it seems to me that there is no " better " alternative.
Nikon has always been able to implement real improvements that work,and being very consistent about it, whereas other makes come with something that at closer look are not that impressive, I remember when Olympus showed up with the M1 and the court case that ensued by Leica no less, what a circus that was, today Olympus has no pro-system that matches Nikon...and Minolta who was first with autofocus in a pro camera, ...gone !
The only true rival is Canon,but is their offering a better one then ?
Several members here have gone over to brands that do not have the same huge lens range that Nikon offers,and, some of their lenses are very expensive, so is this a case then of " I am not going to use what grandpa has " ?
I think it was Graham Whistler who showed some lovely photo`s taken in Africa with a Nikon rig,but has now a Sony, ..so why is that one better ?
Personally I stay with the SLR and have in recent years heavily invested in VR lenses as I rely heavily on Nikon`s famed reliability.
Last edited on Tue Feb 6th, 2024 16:03 by
____________________
Back in Danmark
I do not use my equipment to make photo`s .. I take photo`s to use my equipment
The better I become at photography,the better my camera gets.