| Joined: | Wed Apr 18th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4186 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I agree 100% the Press are very silly why should Kate NOT use a bit of Photoshop? Most serious photographs do and in no way are they trying to deceive but just improve. I removed the green post with AI to improve this photo and why not there is no harm in it?
Click here to comment on this image.
Click here to comment on this image.
I suppose the key question here is…..do Kate/ William receive any payment for the use of their images?
If so, they would be subject to the same constraints as we would be.
That said, I’ve seen ‘photos in photo libraries like Getty and Alamy that have images that have been modified. It’s just that they were done better than Kate’s submission.
We are left to surmise that it was probably better publicity for every one ( except Kate) to mention the editing errors as it added to the feeding frenzy that seems to surround ‘a woman having a serious operation’.
If it was a cleaner from Warrington, after having a hysterectomy and doing some amateur photographic editing while recuperating, it would not get a mention….not even on social media, let alone the world press.
Last edited on Tue Mar 12th, 2024 17:24 by
____________________
Eric