View single post by Eric
 Posted: Tue Sep 16th, 2025 09:24
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4669
Status: 
Offline
novicius wrote:
Congrats with that new gem Ian...as a Pro You would have bought that straight from the shelf I suphose.:applause:

I am all about the SLR ...I would  not even look at those Zorro camera`s,Nope !!..Not me...and then, just recently, I discovered the Z-line has an advantage ( that`s my evil alter ego saying that `fcoz )..still, something about that the sensor sees eventual focus-shift and therefor ,that is no problem any longer,which could be under certain circumstances, macro for example, but most of all, they`ve got ..Vibration  Reduction ...now , several Z- camera`s as 2nd handers have shown up,quite a few actually, now even J K  wants to ditch his , why is that ?...

Yes, the EVF is no match for the SLR, but then as a - specialist - camera perhaps, next to the slr,..personally, my rock-solid stance in favor of the SLR is wavering somewhat...now true to my - only the flagship is good enough for my tripod philosophy -, it would have to be a Z9 ,..but even the Z9 has shown up as a 2ndhander...still pricey `tho...but now I`m wondering/Hoping  if at X-mas time a low mileage cheap-skate Z9 will show up ...

Yes, I have stopped dreaming about the D6, they`re mucho expensive but also, no VR, having several VR lenses ( Tamron 15-30 f2.8 G2...Nikon 24-70 f2.8 ...70-200 f4.0...200-400 f4.0 vr1 ) I have Discovered its virtues and view VR as the biggest invention since the advent of Digital, and that ExtremeLowLight HandHeld photography is well within reach,... handholding that hefty 200-400 at 1/30 renders images so Sharp , simply astounding...now, if only my PC(E) Nikkors had VR, which they would have when mounted on that Z9,...

...gawd, I`m floating in the Univers ,I am...:lol:

The devil is starting to tempt you. :lol:

The truth is we all have to come to these decisions in our own time. We all will have trigger points for change and inevitably change comes with compromises.

I am trialling a Fuji XS20. The image quality out of the camera is the best I’ve seen. I simply don’t need to do any adjustments in Phshp…except for the most extreme lighting situations or when I want to fiddle with the composition.

Fuji cameras and lenses are the lightest and ideal for me as I carry the camera in my hand all the time.
 
However, it’s a DX camera…which means a darker/smaller viewfinder; I need a 16mm lens for even average wide angle shots; some of the buttons/ controls can be irritating. 

In contrast, the Sony A1 is FX; all the controls are perfectly arranged and more configurable to suit my choices.
But its 4x the price of the Fuji. With its lenses it is at least 50% heavier than the equivalent Fuji set up.

Sure it will do a lot better at action and tracking photography….but how much of that do I do now?

It’s all about coming to a decision about what better suits your ongoing needs and getting the camera system that feels the best fit or has the least irritations. Nothings perfect.

I am not sure I need the Sony. I only use it now for speed or distance related subjects.

It’s interesting to hear Iain’s reasoning for going to the Z9. One of the reasons I abandoned Fuji and went back to Nikons some years ago was that the Fuji light bodies were imbalanced when I used large telephotos on it.

It’s the reason I haven’t bought a big lens for this Fuji and still keep the Sony for telephoto work.

Last edited on Tue Sep 16th, 2025 09:24 by



____________________
Eric