| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | South Lakeland, UK |
| Posts: | 4066 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I like the DAM aspect, although PhotoMechanic may be better, I don't know. I can find a particular image pretty quickly if I need to and that's all I want.
I find the keywording reasonable although I think it could be improved. Some sort of algorithm to help it learn which keywords go together and which don't from history shouldn't be too difficult. There is a pattern there, it's just extracting the core data then making use of it.
If I have selected for example 'lake' and 'boat' for the last 50 images it should be able to cope with 'reflections' or 'sail' on a couple of images without completely loosing the plot. (Which it does.)
It should be capable of building a list of associated keywords behind the scenes, which it should make available once a pattern develops.
Although I do find it interesting to analyse which lenses I use and break down by camera etc.
____________________
Robert.