| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6877 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Blackfox;...till you have actually experienced it yourself i don't really think you can pass judgment .
Ah but, I can pass judgement because....I'm a taxpayer and my tax money has been wasted on public servants who are clearly unaccountable, and in this case on a murdering SPG thug, not to mention the £million or so the trial might have cost, and the bent judge's wages.
There's also the fact that none of the lice nearby who saw it did anything, just casually strolled on leaving a man dying, ignoring what one of theirs had done as if it never happened.
Mr Tomlinson like any other English person had every right to be there.
This is what happens when you don't truly disband the SPG and simply rename it. New name, same old thugs. SPG were scum back in the 70's & 80's....they're still there, still scum, still bludgeoning the public just because the PM and his Home secretary don't like the English electorate getting too close.
The SPG have a new role, no longer do they focus on provoking black people, nowadays they're employed by the Prime Minister of the day as a personal SS.
"its very easy to sit in your comfortable home and pass judgement without knowing the FULL facts"
you don't need to know 'em, all one needs to know is an arrogant bully employed by the met unlawfully killed a civilian, and is walking free because of a bent judge.
Obviously, it's ok to go and kill someone by pushing them to the ground with a large stick, it must be ok, Harwood is told it's ok so it must be.
.....then again his skills might have extended to a bit of masonary, one wonders.
Need to be careful here folks.
There are general forum rules.
Whilst I might agree with some of the sentiments the tone of the posts need to be a bit less provocative or 'aggressive' lest we all fall into the hands of the black shirts and thought police.
I think we are better placed if we provide rationale and reasoned arguments rather than subjective comment on stuff that is without proof.
Personally I think there are many aspects of the law that need reform.
The last and current governments have presided over a drop in standards in society which reflect the society we live in.
To paraphrase a famous 60's politician.... This once proud nation is now the laughing stock of the world.
Identify the politician and events
How can a country be taken seriously when it has politicians who cant manage and unions who are so completely out of touch with world events that they think it useful and effective to call strikes at a time when the whole nation is in the public eye.
Truly a decaying third world nation that is pompous enough to believe that its banana republic is the centre of a great empire.
Back to the original topic about the policeman getting off. I think that in criminal proceedings there has to be clear evidence to find a person guilty or if lack of evidence to acquit.
In this case I believe that the police have a unique position of law breaker, law enforcer and evidence gatherers so a clear conflict of roles.
Since the perpetrator is still around but the vital witness is dead the policeman would get off under reasonable doubt!!! I dont agree with the verdict but ...... the reverse would be that you accuse somebody of murder and hang them without trial because they have a face that you dont like!!
Balances are difficult to achieve. Hence the statue on/at the Old Bailey.!!
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none