| Joined: | Wed Apr 11th, 2012 |
| Location: | Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 1245 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
blackfox wrote:
thought it over checked out prices and i'll stick with nikon ,its just that sony seem to be the only company at present offering fast burst rates ,i don't do to bad with what i got though ,so till the magic fairy dumps some money in my wallet its keep dreaming
Do you need a high burst rate for wildlife? I thought that was the preserve of sports/journalist? A mate of mine has a Sony, the focus is horrible compared to any of my Nikons.
it helps in certain circumstances rich ,i can only talk from experience with the lower priced canon and nikon bodies but the two things you need are are fast focus and fast high burst rates ,nothing worse than getting a good bird shot to find your buffer is full ,or sat in a hide hearing the canons going off like machine guns around you i suppose its phycological really .as i said i don't do bad at all with what i have .so i'll stick for now