View single post by Doug
 Posted: Mon Oct 29th, 2012 16:43
Doug

 

Joined: Mon Apr 9th, 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
Bob Bowen wrote:
Smaller, lighter, cheaper coupled with the high ISO capabilities nowadays can be very appealing to some maker sectors. I can't cope with heavy kit anymore so quality f4 suits me now.

You and me both Bob, but Nikon has thrown the baby out with the bath water again. You wait for years for a 70-200 f4 to match Canon then when they bring it out you have to pay extra for a tripod coller that comes standard with the Canon ones.

Come on Nikon get you act in gear.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Canon 70-200 f4 comes with NO tripod collar

It's about time Nikon caught up to Canon in this area (the big C have/had a couple of lenses that produce fantastic images with great performance and less cost and weight - this was one of them, the 17-40 f4 is another)

I imagine street price will be on par with the Canon equivalent



____________________
Recent & Popular posts
ProCapture | Genius on Demand Blog