| Joined: | Sun Apr 22nd, 2012 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 261 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
If I thought there was a reasonable company whose morals and principles matched mine then I would be happy to work for a wage that covered my costs of going to work.
However the likelihood of that is fairly small as most companies would rather have someone with a huge mortgage and debt burden, as they are more easy to control, than someone who might challenge them if they were immoral, unethical or the like over whom they have no hold.
So national minimum wage wouldn't interest you JK?.
As for employer's morals, they're gone with the wind mate. It's all corporate now.
"However the likelihood of that is fairly small as most companies would rather have someone with a huge mortgage and debt burden"
.....Ur ass is mine, the corporate model.
Huge employee debt encourages backstabbing, snitching and general psychopathic behaviour amongst employees, particularly managers. i.e. the innocent get crapped on because their managers have too much to lose by sticking to morals. Such managers are seen as getting results. Yup, the corporate model, imported.
There is one who did me a while ago, but he has an appointment with a bin liner and a golf club....best way to deal with scum like that is put the bstds in a coma.
Talking of jobs though, I know someone who like me took voluntary redundancy from the public sector and paid off his mortgage. Trouble was he couldn't get a job despite excellent references and experience. So, my mate changed his Resume and advertised himself as bone idle, unreliable, and quite dangerous in the workplace......straight away he gets three job offers, so what does that tell you?
Last edited on Mon Nov 26th, 2012 16:19 by steve of oxford