| Joined: | Sun Apr 1st, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6828 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
The functionality in FastStone is amazing.
Lightroom has a better RAW processing engine without dounbt.
But most people who dont want to do extensive changes to their images would find it a big expense for not a lot extra compared to FastStone.
On Mac then I'd agree with you absolutely.
However for image browsing I find LR less good than PhotoMechanic. A personal thing.
I use Lightroom for reviewing images with my customers as it is very easy and I can show them selected images by using filtering and keywords.
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none