View single post by Eric
 Posted: Tue Jan 29th, 2013 18:29
Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4435
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric wrote: Squarerigger wrote:
Maybe it's got something to do with cost. The new launch is almost half the price of the current 16-35mm lens.o.O

I am sure you are right. But that being the case, the easiest way to keep the cost down is to keep the existing lens. OK it was only an AF, not AFS ...but compared to the 17-35 f2.8 there is not IQ difference at f5.6 and smaller!

When I bought my 17-35 to replace my 18-35 I had to try 4 examples before I got a 17-35 that was noticeably sharper than the 18-35. I nearly gave up and stuck with the 18-35!!
Have you tested the XE1 with 18-55 against the D7000 with 17-35 f2.8 ?
If I had a DX camera other than the D300 then I'd do the test.

I think I can guess the winner of the test ?
It doesnt bear thinking about for me as I am sure my wallet would hurt!!



Can you?



____________________
Eric