| Joined: | Sun Apr 1st, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6830 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Jonathon
I don't like to disagree, but there is a definite role for the D4 in macro work. The object of getting the maximum number of pixels on target and as great a depth of field as possible make the high ISO capacity and higher pixel density than the D3s very attractive.
Ed
I dont think we are in disagreement.
I think that there is a definite role for the D4 in press and reportage but the extra pixels between 12 and 16 are not really significant but maybe they are?. I dont really do macro, I like micro but donthave the equipment for it. EMs are too expensive!
The D3X has more pixels than the D4. Is that not better for macro?
The D4X would be better surely for macro if it had 36-48MP ?
The D400 is meant to be 24MP, that is higher pixel density on a DX format than the D800 with 36MP on FX format.
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none