| Joined: | Wed Apr 18th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4187 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
For me the D600 (dust spots included, apparently they disappear after >4000 shots, only 1700 more to go.) is more useful on a daily basis. The D800 is great but it is bigger, heavier and its image size at 36MP is more than I need unless I want a grain free image blown up for the side of O2 Arena. Strangely I havent had too many of these requests. I really need to get out and find some banking customers!
Whilst that is a very good reason for using the D600, it doesn't answer the question.... Are the smaller D800 pixels better than the D600 pixels?
The 'grain free image blow up' you mention suggests that''s true and the conventional wisdom of best IQ = big pixels has changed?
Using the 100% crop comparison method recently discussed... Does the D800 file look better at 100% in CS, than the D600 file?
So many restless questions....clearly cake deficiency setting in.
____________________
Eric