View single post by jk
 Posted: Fri Mar 21st, 2014 05:46
jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6826
Status: 
Offline
Yes I do think that it has been worthwhile.
The debates that raged on forums regarding 120 v 35mm and then film v digital and recently about How many MP required before digital is better than film get answered slowly and there is always the anti-technology camp.

However I believe that we are firmly in a digital age.
Graham's 120 image shows good detail in many areas but the D800 image does look more 5x4 like. :-)

The next debates are already out there.
Optical viewfinder v Electronic Viewfinder (EVF)
APS-C v 4/3 format

Having the new Fuji XT1 with its great EVF convinces me that this is good enough for everyday use and the IQ from the 16MP sensor is as good as my FX Nikon D3S. However under certain lighting conditions the EVF is not suitable e.g. my flamenco dance pictures.

The debate over APS-C V 4/3 format is about sensor noise with small photosites and I dont think the technology is there yet!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none