This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  10  11  12  13  14  15   
Z Series arrives   -   Page   15
 Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 07:58
 
141st Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I am looking to build a very simple lens set.
14-30 f4
85 f1.8
70-200 f2.8


However I am asking myself the following question. Can I do everything I want or need to do with my current Fuji setup?


I repeat my question....how does a mirrorless trump (sorry) a DSLR? What drives you away from DSLR?


I prefer to take less pictures, than more, especially with the size of image files. I find the mirrorless allows me to produce my previsualised image more easily that a DSLR that doesnt have the EVF.
Since I moved to mirrorless I probably take 1/2 to 2/3 less images than I did with my D3.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 16:30
 
142nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4548
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I am looking to build a very simple lens set.
14-30 f4
85 f1.8
70-200 f2.8


However I am asking myself the following question. Can I do everything I want or need to do with my current Fuji setup?


I repeat my question....how does a mirrorless trump (sorry) a DSLR? What drives you away from DSLR?


I prefer to take less pictures, than more, especially with the size of image files. I find the mirrorless allows me to produce my previsualised image more easily that a DSLR that doesnt have the EVF.
Since I moved to mirrorless I probably take 1/2 to 2/3 less images than I did with my D3.


That's what I believe to be the main advantage of mirrorless...previewing exposure. I'm struggling for a second meritous point.

But that may be enough.o.O



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 17:12
 
143rd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
What I yearn for from a camera is what I had with the Bronica S2a, a ground glass screen which I could fine focus with a loupe and compose a picture (albeit inverse) usually on a tripod, in a leisurely fashion.

This is quite different from action photography, which frequently requires multiple rapid exposures with very quick response.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Oct 1st, 2018 04:13
 
144th Post
GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 301
Status: 
Offline
My main objection to EVFs, based on an Olympus OM-D EM 5, is that I couldn't see whether the image was in focus through the finder. With an SLR I always assess focus on the focusing screen before pressing the shutter. With the EM 5 it was very much a case of trusting the AF to have got it right.

Unless the much improved EVF of the Z series has resolved this issue I don't see the advantage of going mirrorless. It simply doesn't do what I need.

 




Posted: Mon Oct 1st, 2018 08:10
 
145th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Geoff that is either a function of you using the wrong glasses prescription or not adjusting the dioptre on the camera viewfinder correctly.

The EVF renders and image equally well as a optical system. What does differ between the two is the refresh rate. Under poor light conditions and where there is fast movement depending on the EVF refresh rate the rendering can be extremely poor.
At >4MP EVF become common and with fast refresh rates the difference between OVF and EVF become an item of preference rather than functional difference.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Oct 1st, 2018 15:05
 
146th Post
GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 301
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote: Geoff that is either a function of you using the wrong glasses prescription or not adjusting the dioptre on the camera viewfinder correctly.

The EVF renders and image equally well as a optical system. What does differ between the two is the refresh rate. Under poor light conditions and where there is fast movement depending on the EVF refresh rate the rendering can be extremely poor.
At >4MP EVF become common and with fast refresh rates the difference between OVF and EVF become an item of preference rather than functional difference.
Actually I suspect it is a function of a 1.6MD EVF with a 16MP camera losing much of the detail. If it were my prescription I would have the same problem with an SLR.

 




Posted: Mon Oct 1st, 2018 15:59
 
147th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Is the OM only 1.6MP in EVF? Eeeek. Very grainy!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue Oct 2nd, 2018 04:08
 
148th Post
GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 301
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote: Is the OM only 1.6MP in EVF? Eeeek. Very grainy!I believe the Mk2 is better however I wasn't prepared to spend more money on another system in the vague hope that the viewfinder might be adequate. I ditched the EM5 for a D4 which delivers the results I require.

 




Posted: Tue Oct 2nd, 2018 09:49
 
149th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
GeoffR wrote: jk wrote: Is the OM only 1.6MP in EVF? Eeeek. Very grainy!I believe the Mk2 is better however I wasn't prepared to spend more money on another system in the vague hope that the viewfinder might be adequate. I ditched the EM5 for a D4 which delivers the results I require.
I think you made a good decision.
I think 4/3 is a nice format but too small for critical work especially if you want to crop and make enlargements.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1569     Current time is 06:01 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  10  11  12  13  14  15     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Z Series arrives Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0972 seconds (75% database + 25% PHP). 85 queries executed.