This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
50 GigaPixels anybody?   -   Page   2
The D800 resolution is nothing!  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Sun Jun 24th, 2012 03:51
 
11th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
The quest for extreme detail is limited by the ability to display it.

I made a very detailed panorama across Morecambe bay of Grange over Sands, using the D1 and 80-200 f2.8 at 200mm. Although 'only' taken with a D1, with careful viewing I could see the glazing bars in windows 4 miles away, easily pick out people walking on the promenade, etc. However, in order to see these details the image needed to be printed at least 11 feet long by about 1 foot high. At that point I lost interest.

Perhaps something for the GoS tourist information office? But little other practical application.

I do wonder occasionally about repeating the process with the D200 or even the D3100 which I believe has an even higher resolution... But, I really don't know what I would do with the resulting image. It's an interesting process, which I enjoyed but without being able to view the full image easily I see little point.

A local chap has made a very nice panorama of the Duddon estuary, with very nice lighting and snow on the Lakeland fells, taken but a few yards from my home. He got around the display problem by splitting the pano into three and placing the sections above one another in a normal 24" x 30" frame, but I wasn't totally convinced by that format, despite it being well presented and nicely framed.


The images from the original post camera will never be used to create one full print, more to examine detail on a computer screen by zooming in to 1:1 for surveillance reasons and possibly creating local crops for sharing with others in the department.

This is where I have difficulty with the current trend towards even greater definition in general purpose cameras. The practicalities of actually displaying all that detail to a viewer are not insignificant nor easily overcome.

Interesting conundrum! :devil:



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sun Jun 24th, 2012 05:20
 
12th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
You could get an Apple Thunderbolt display and display it in sections.
A cheaper alternative is the Dell UltraSharp U2711 which uses the same panel (2560 x 1440 pixels) as the Apple unit but no additional bits like the Thunderbolt interface.

There is of course the Dell UltraSharp U3011 as well if you want a larger screen with even more detail 2560 x 1600.
All priced accordingly.

:lol:

Hope that you are OK with all that rain in the north of UK.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sun Jun 24th, 2012 14:18
 
13th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
You miss my point by a mile JK! :lol:

I am talking about the actual finished print, or whatever... My D1 pano needed printing 10 feet wide in order for all the available detail to be visible.

If the available details aren't to be visible in the finished print, why bother capturing them in the first place?

Rain?

We had a little the other day... Nothing really exceptional.

There are a few moaners about but then there always are, lovely sunshine today, it almost made 15ÂșC.

:lol: :devil:



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Jun 25th, 2012 02:33
 
14th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
I tried to do some panorama printing back in 2002 when I did a nice one in the Pyrenees.
I found at the time that it seemed to be impossible to get my Epson Photo Stylus EX to print longer than 24".

I dont know if modern printers can print longer than that it seems to me that if you have roll paper you should be able to print to any length!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Jun 25th, 2012 02:33
 
15th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
I tried to do some panorama printing back in 2002 when I did a nice one in the Pyrenees.
I found at the time that it seemed to be impossible to get my Epson Photo Stylus EX to print longer than 24".

I dont know if modern printers can print longer than that it seems to me that if you have roll paper you should be able to print to any length!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Jun 25th, 2012 02:33
 
16th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
I tried to do some panorama printing back in 2002 when I did a nice one in the Pyrenees.
I found at the time that it seemed to be impossible to get my Epson Photo Stylus EX to print longer than 24".

I dont know if modern printers can print longer than that it seems to me that if you have roll paper you should be able to print to any length!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Jun 25th, 2012 04:59
 
17th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Triple post JK?

My lab at Lancaster was quite prepared to print it as long as their paper rolls, 100ft? and even stitch it longer! but the cost was out of my ballpark.

They did one 5 ft long for me as a test, and it was pretty good but you needed a magnifying glass to see the smaller detail.

Sadly the lab seems to have gone. :-(



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Jun 25th, 2012 07:02
 
18th Post
richw



Joined: Tue Apr 10th, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 525
Status: 
Offline
How about like this:

http://www.360cities.net/gigapixel/strahov-library.html

 




Posted: Fri Jun 29th, 2012 08:08
 
19th Post
Ray Ninness

 

Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Bedford, New Hampshire USA
Posts: 92
Status: 
Offline
richw wrote: How about like this:

http://www.360cities.net/gigapixel/strahov-library.html

Rich, that is some serious mind boggling imagery..

I have looked at several methods for doing those kinds of images, but now days, photography is not in the forefront in my life. So while interesting it's a bit out of my league.

:sssshh:



____________________
Ray Ninness
F8Photos.com
Bedford, New Hampshire
USA
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 231     Current time is 12:25 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Other Makes of Camera > 50 GigaPixels anybody? Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0567 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 77 queries executed.