| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   |
|
|||||||
| Fuji EX1 evaluation - Page 6 | |
Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Fri Sep 13th, 2013 11:38 |
|
51st Post |
Eric
|
jk wrote:Need to use the AFC mode as that provides faster focus capability but only at the point where the cross + is located. I am doing...still doesn't match a DSLR for response.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Sep 13th, 2013 17:56 |
|
52nd Post |
jk
|
Eric wrote: jk wrote: Yep that is definitely the case. The AF in a DSLR is much better.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 14th, 2013 11:58 |
|
53rd Post |
amazing50
|
jk: It would be interesting to see what a shot on your D600 with say a 200mm at f5.6 lens cropped to the same size as a full frame shot taken with your Fuji which would be 560mm f5.6 equivalent.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 14th, 2013 14:06 |
|
54th Post |
jk
|
amazing50 wrote: jk: It would be interesting to see what a shot on your D600 with say a 200mm at f5.6 lens cropped to the same size as a full frame shot taken with your Fuji which would be 560mm f5.6 equivalent. When I get back go Spain (later this month or in October) I will do a straight comparison. The Fuji is APS-C (DX) so it is only a x1.5 multiplier compared to a FX camera. D600 with 300mm lens, and XPro1 with 55-200. I'll also do a near equivalence so a D600 with 200mm and then cropped up to 300mm view so this will yield a near similar angle of view and MP equivalence. D600 (24MP) v. XPro1 (16MP).
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 14th, 2013 15:54 |
|
55th Post |
Eric
|
jk wrote:amazing50 wrote:jk: It would be interesting to see what a shot on your D600 with say a 200mm at f5.6 lens cropped to the same size as a full frame shot taken with your Fuji which would be 560mm f5.6 equivalent. Interestingly... The 55-200 paperwork says it is the equivalent of 84-305. So ... unlike Nikon DX lenses, Fuji haven't corrected their lenses for the multiplication factor. They are effectively FX lenses?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 14th, 2013 16:40 |
|
56th Post |
jk
|
Eric wrote: jk wrote: No the Fuji lenses wont cover a FX format. The lenses are designed specifically for the X series cameras and wouldnt focus accurately on a FX camera. The focus point is (I think) on 14-19mm behind the lens
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 14th, 2013 16:49 |
|
57th Post |
Eric
|
jk wrote:Eric wrote:jk wrote: But we are back to the old chestnut. How can a 55-200 be 'equivalent' to an 84-305 ...unless the magnification factor is being applied? Never get my head round this assertion. A DX lens on a DX body has exactly the same field of view as the same focal lens as an Fx lens on an Fx body. Only when an FX lens is used on a DX body is there any relevance to a 35mm equivalent statement. I have not however compared the field of view on the Fuji to the above mentioned scenarios. But I feel the 18mm of the 18-55 isnt as wide as the 18-105 DX on my D7000. Hence my view the Fuji isn't corrected. Need to check.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 14th, 2013 18:12 |
|
58th Post |
amazing50
|
I thought the magnification factor was 2.7 x. It must be for a different camera.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Sep 15th, 2013 04:52 |
|
59th Post |
jk
|
amazing50 wrote: I thought the magnification factor was 2.7 x. It must be for a different camera.That is with the Nikon 1 series of cameras. They have a x2.7 focal length multiplier effect.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Sep 15th, 2013 04:57 |
|
60th Post |
jk
|
Eric wrote: jk wrote:No an 18mm on the Fuji whether it is a Nikon or a Fuji lens should give the same field of view as a 18mm on a DX but that lens placed on a FX camera (presuming it is a lens that covers a full frame camera sensor will provide a wider field of view. I have a very nice diagram somewhere that explains this I will try to dig out later today when I have done my other jobs for this morning/afternoon.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 471 Current time is 07:31 | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Other Makes of Camera > Fuji EX1 evaluation | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0802 seconds (72% database + 28% PHP). 100 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0802 seconds (72% database + 28% PHP). 100 queries executed.