Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
highlander



Joined: Wed Jul 25th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
I decided, whilst trying to get back on my feet, to have a foray into Canon.

I duly purchased a little used Canon 50D and three lenses. It had around 12,000 shots on it.

After 7 months of daily, but light use, and another 6,000 shots I got a fatal error.

Cost of repair for the fatally jammed shutter? £275. Trade in value (if fixed) £220.

Cost to replace £350 with another used body (possibly to suffer the same fate)

I have done neither.

Having spoken to a fellow Canon user; "I've got two bodies like that in a draw somewhere"

amazing50

 

Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
If the 50D has all the features you require then I would suggest repairing it. After a year or so sell the whole kit and get updated gear.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
Nothing intrinsically wrong with Canon stuff if the ergonomics work for you I'd get a new/replacement body and carry on shooting. We wont hold it against you if you use Canon. I have a Canon G12 that I use underwater.

I also shoot with the Fuji XPro1 and XE1 these days. Just as high quality output as the D3 but not as good as the D3S, D600 or D800. However under certain conditions (in studio) it is a definite winner!

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1411
Status: 
Offline
The 50d is prone to a few problems, you might have been better with a 40d.

The pro models are fine the lower end stuff I'm not so keen on.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
Jan, take a look at this topic before making fiture decisions.
http://www.nikondslr.uk/view_topic.php?id=841&forum_id=11

The Fujis are becoming a viable high quality alternative to heavy DSLRs.
They probably are suitable for landscape but not wildlife unless you want to manual focus which if you are using a long lens may be better anyway.


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0190 seconds (64% database + 36% PHP). 55 queries executed.