 |
| |
| This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
| Moderated by: chrisbet, | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MN
|
Hello, I am new to this forum, specifically to try and get some feedback on a particular question. I bought a D3200 a little over a year ago because I was completely frustrated with point-and-shoot cameras. I absolutely LOVE the change I made! So much so, I am considering upgrading the camera. I have no professional or semi-professional aspirations. My main interests are my fast-moving young children and their fast-moving friends, my friends and family and landscapes. I use a Tamron 18-270mm as my "most of the time" lens, a Nikon 35mm f1.8 prime at times as well as a Sigma 10-20mm wide angle. I have been considering moving to a D5200 or D5300 or possibly a D7100. Is the moderate investment in a D5200 or D5300 worth it? Is an upgrade to a D7100 with the "more robust" investment worth thinking about? Here's a little more in case it helps. I never use the guide mode on the D3200. I ony shoot in RAW and use Lightroom for processing. I have had what I percieve to be some minor focusing issues with the D3200 in "busy" shots. For example, on a recent hike on a wooded trail, the camera often wanted to focus on the trees instead of my kids. (Maybe I need to get used to manual focusing but I doubt my wife will ever want to do that). Thanks for your time and your help! |
|||||||||
jk
|
The D5300 is a better version of the D3200/3300 with some more bells and twiddles. The D7100 is currently the best DX format camera and has good build quality but is not pro build quality. The sensor in these cameras are all DX sized. I dont think you will notice any image quality differences but the D5300 and more so the D7100 will give you better functionality and ease of use. If you want a pro build and quality then at present you need to go for a FX (35mm sized which is about 1/3 larger than the DX sized sensor). Nikon have not released a replacement for the D300s which is now getting on for 6 years old. Many of us are waiting for this camera which is by rumour called D400 rather than going for the D7100. I hope this helps. |
|||||||||
Robert
|
Welcome to the forum MN. I have a D3200 which I use as a knockabout, snapshot camera which I use mainly with an 18-105mm Nikkor lens, my main camera is the D200 which in use, is twice the camera at least, in my opinion. The necessity to work through menus to alter the settings is the killer for me, that and the single command dial. The D7200 is a capable body, but I would try to get your hands on a D300S to try for a couple of hours to see the difference in handling that brings. I doubt you would see much if any difference in image quality for family use but the speed of focusing and general handling are in a different league from the D3200. Never used a D7200 so can't comment on that. I have missed numerous shots of family and pets using the D3200 which I would have caught with my D200. |
|||||||||
MN
|
Thanks Robert. That was helpful. It looks like there are many similarities between the D7100 and D300s, in particular the 51point AF system. I suspect that may be the difference between the missed shots and the better performance you mentioned. Thanks again! |
|||||||||
MN
|
Thanks JK. No need to go pro for now. Thanks for your feedback. |
|||||||||
jk
|
MN wrote: Thanks JK. No need to go pro for now. Thanks for your feedback. Welcome to the forum. There are many of us with different cameras and I have a pretty good range but I have never had a D3xxx, D5xxx, D7xxx only because I tend to prefer the FX cameras but I do have a D300 and it is 7/8 years old and is excellent. D300 doesnt have the video option or the two card slots of the D300S. |
|||||||||
Robert
|
JK has just discretely pointed out to me the Nikon D7200 isn't available yet! I of course mean the D7100! Sorry for any confusion, That's probably why I never used one... I haven't used a D7000 or the D7100 either, just to clarify... It was so much easier when there was just the F3 and one or two others, like the FA, FM and FE. Less room for confusion. Back to the manuscript, only another 47 pages to format.  |
|||||||||
amazing50
|
MN you posted "I have no professional or semi-professional aspirations. My main interests are my fast-moving young children and their fast-moving friends, my friends and family and landscapes. I use a Tamron 18-270mm as my "most of the time" lens, a Nikon 35mm f1.8 prime at times as well as a Sigma 10-20mm wide angle." You already have a good kit for the type of pix you are taking and 24meg pixils. I also use the Tamron 18-270 but on a D5100. No complaints except no GPS, but it's not worth the expense to move up to a D5300. You might consider spending on accesories like a good tripod, and wate a while, as there is a lot brewing with new models and mirrorless in the near future. |
|||||||||
jk
|
amazing50 wrote:
Try this add-on if you need GPS on a D5200. I have one for my D600 and D800. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Micnova-GPS-N-GPS-Receiver-for-Nikon-D3200-D5100-D5200-D7000-D7100-D90-D3x-LF483-/390903160976?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item5b03a4e090 Similar available from China, Canada, USA, etc... |
|||||||||
Robert
|
My answer to that one is to take a photo with the iPhone and mix it with the other images from the same session. Works well in Lightroom, for me anyway. |
|||||||||
amazing50
|
jk the GPS link doesn't ship to Canada but I found one that does and ordered one that comes with both cords for $53 CDN. Thanks |
|||||||||
jk
|
Good news. I find it so useful having GPS data in the EXIF. Have you had first snow yet? I noticed news reports of snow storms in Calgary. And here we are in Spain on 38C and no sign of rain since last year. 85mm rain since August 2013, we should have had more than 450mm! |
|||||||||
amazing50
|
jk Calgary is 3000 KM west, we are in a different weather system most of the time influenced by the Great Lakes, think Mediterraniam Sea for size. In the last 2 weeks there has been heavy rainfall, about 100mm. Thankfully it wasn't snow as that much would give us almost a meter of snow. Seems there is no rain in Spain to fall on the plain. |
|||||||||
richw
|
Robert wrote:My answer to that one is to take a photo with the iPhone and mix it with the other images from the same session. Works well in Lightroom, for me anyway. I have an App on my iPhone that produces a log file. I load this into Lightroom and as long as the clocks are in synch between phone and camera voila! You can also adjust the clock synching in Lightroom if they are out. Sounds complicated but actually really easy. Lightroom will populate the exif data for you. Only issue is remembering to switch the app on. |
|||||||||
Robert
|
Thanks for that Rich, I will try and find the app. I have a Garmin 60CXS which produces log files but it only has a PC interface...  I discovered both my D3200 and the D200 clocks were set to GMT (winter time) rather than BST (summer time) so the iPhone clock was 1 Hr wrong, or right? I adjusted all the Nikon images +1Hr and something went silly, the times were right but they sorted backwards!!!. I had to delete the images from Lightroom and re-import them, it worked OK second time around. |
|||||||||
richw
|
This is the one I have: http://www.geotagphotos.net |
|||||||||
Robert
|
Thanks Rich, website looks good, will probably D/L it tomorrow. :thumbsup: |
|||||||||
Graham Whistler
|
Hi MN Welcome to our friendly and I hope helpful group! I had a D300 for several years as a 2nd body and the quality of images from it even against todays DSLR is very good.(I made a 4 foot wide pin sharp print from a D300 image, see pix below.) I regret trading it in 2 years ago. My daughter is a highly skilled photographer also with a young family and loves her D300. They still hold good 2nd hand values that must mean something, a good 2nd hand body ranges £350-£400 in UK.I would go for one rather than one of the present DX bodies. If Nikon came out with a D400 I would be very keen to get one as a user of the D810 FX camera I do at times find a bag full of large FX lenses is very heavy for travel photography. Attachment: Srour4427.jpg (Downloaded 14 times) |
|||||||||
Current theme is Blue
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you. |