This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
D500 with 80-400mm Nikon AF-S   -   Page   3 | |
Owle shoot Malcolm & Graham | Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Sun Jul 31st, 2016 11:31 |
|
21st Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
This was the other Eagle Owl. We were going to do flight pixs of the Barn Owls but the rain came and put stop to that so we will go back again in a few days time. This chap was very large!!! Attachment: Eagle Owl 1504.jpg (Downloaded 73 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31st, 2016 13:17 |
|
22nd Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
That image is Post#16 is very good. Post#21 is excellent as well but Post#16 image a lot more unusual.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31st, 2016 17:13 |
|
23rd Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
jk wrote:That image is Post#16 is very good. Plus one. All these images are excellent, at this level they need that little extra 'WOW' factor and that's what I was referring to in my last post. Post 16 image is exceptional, I also love the two little Owlets in the rain. Thank you both for sharing these excellent images, I feel it gives me something to aspire to, may never get there but at least I can try. We have a 'World Owl Centre' at Muncaster Castle, not far from here, I have tried taking photographs there but nothing like a nice as these.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31st, 2016 18:42 |
|
24th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Got a few of the Indian Eagle Owl in flight but light was poor so would have liked to push shutter a bit faster. We will have another go at flight pixs on next trip. Attachment: Eagle Owl 1688.jpg (Downloaded 67 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14th, 2016 13:23 |
|
25th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Todays pix is a Common Sandpiper at Farlington Marshes D500 with 80-400mm AF-S Lens + x1.4. Attachment: C Sandpiper 2074.jpg (Downloaded 55 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16th, 2016 12:09 |
|
26th Post |
Iain![]() ![]()
![]() |
A nice set of images Graham.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16th, 2016 18:13 |
|
27th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
My error this wader is in fact a Green Shank! Another view from further away. Much more noise as it is just centre of frame. Attachment: Another view2067.jpg (Downloaded 46 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17th, 2016 02:50 |
|
28th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote:Much more noise as it is just centre of frame. Graham...excuse be being a bit thick..... Do you mean it's more obvious because it's a sectional enlargement or have you actually noticed there is more noise in the centre of the D500 sensor than the edges???
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17th, 2016 04:29 |
|
29th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
No Just because it's a very big blow-up from small section of the pix. The bird was just a bit larger in viewfinder than the focus spot. It was more than twice the distance from me than the previous pix. Lens at 400mm plus x1.4. Noise is same across pix but blow up of whole image area would be a print 4ft wide!
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17th, 2016 12:22 |
|
30th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote:No Just because it's a very big blow-up from small section of the pix. The bird was just a bit larger in viewfinder than the focus spot. It was more than twice the distance from me than the previous pix. Lens at 400mm plus x1.4. Noise is same across pix but blow up of whole image area would be a print 4ft wide! Ok thanks, that's what I thought you meant but I just had a thought you might have discovered variable noise across the sensor. I suppose that's a bit daft really but strange things do happen. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 1357 Current time is 12:09 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D500 with 80-400mm Nikon AF-S | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |