This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
D4 or D800   -   Page   2 | |
Dunno if this is the correct forum | Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 01:51 |
|
11th Post |
Constable![]() ![]()
![]() |
Hi jk Correct in principle, but in practice the D800E seems to overexpose by about 1 to 1.2 stops so my normal setting is -0.7 EV. Therefore EV=0, is an overexposure of +0.7. The D4 just seems to nail it correctly without ned for exposure correction or PP. Ed
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 02:08 |
|
12th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Thanks for the info. That is interesting as it implies that Nikon have improved the metering. I havent done any bird pictures with the D800 yet.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 03:07 |
|
13th Post |
blackfox![]() ![]()
![]() |
funny you should bring this up j.k as its one of the main differences i noticed when changing from canon to a d7000 ,with my canons i always had to flick my + exp compensation right up for birds in flight .with the d7000 leaving it at 0 is more than sufficient ,two different approaches but as long as you know your camera/lenses and how they work as a combo who cares. in fact heres one of mine from last week a little egret taken off the cuff exp comp set at -0.33 ev .theres no way i would have got this shot at this setting with a canon .camera d7000 ,lens 300mmf4 with 1.7tc . ![]()
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 03:54 |
|
14th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
In both of those examples its a white bird against a 'light' blue sky, with no white clouds ...and parts of the birds are lit with direct sunlight. The backlighting is therefore countered to a very large extent and I would have expected to keep the exp comp to a minimum.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 05:10 |
|
15th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
It is also dependent on the metering mode. I use Matrix Metering. I have been shooting bee-eaters and hawks recently with the D3 but I need to use +1.7 or +2EV.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 07:50 |
|
16th Post |
Ed Matusik![]() ![]()
![]() |
You've convinced me Ed. The D4 is my next camera.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 12:22 |
|
17th Post |
Constable![]() ![]()
![]() |
Ed M And I discovered another reason today. D4, 1.7 TC, 300 f4 ended up between me and the ground in some non-olympian athletics! D4 ... Ok, just a war scratch. 300 OK, dent on lens hood. TC - stuffed. Lens-mounting ring distorted. D4 couples perfectly to all lenses and focus is spot on. Lucky but maybe an argument for always having a TC! Ed
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 13:29 |
|
18th Post |
Squarerigger![]() ![]()
![]() |
Constable wrote:Ed M No mention of the operators condition?
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 14:25 |
|
19th Post |
Ed Matusik![]() ![]()
![]() |
Constable wrote: Ed M All OK I hope? I've been in a quandry wondering if I should get the D4 or wait to see if a DX version would be released under the D400 designation, but now, with your experiences I have no doubt. - EdM.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 1st, 2012 14:33 |
|
20th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Constable wrote:Ed M When I got my gold medal in the D3/24-70 hurling event last year, the 24-70 disintegrated into several bits...but the mount stayed fixed and intact on the D3. The lens was easily reassembled. It made me wonder if there was a deliberate 'crumple-zone' in the modern lenses such that it sacrificially takes the impact in an area of least concern?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 293 Current time is 20:27 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D4 or D800 | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |