This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next Page Last Page  
Bird Photography 2025   -   Page   8
Another year of feathery captures  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Wed Jul 30th, 2025 11:35
 
71st Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Graham, 
Lightroom Classic, not Lightroom, is what you need as that uses local everything and saves back to your desired local drive!
Lightroom Classic is probably the best image cataloguing system I have ever used.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Jul 30th, 2025 16:09
 
72nd Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1934
Status: 
Offline
Similar shot JK, but all PS this time and much better quality. Lightroom is, as you know, included with PS, but Classic, no doubt, is better but I would not use it much, and the extra cost would be silly to spend if not used.

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Wed Jul 30th, 2025 19:21
 
73rd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
I get Photoshop and Lightroom Classic for my Adobe subscription that used to be £9.99/month now increased to £14.99/month.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Jul 30th, 2025 19:56
 
74th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4547
Status: 
Online
jk wrote:
I get Photoshop and Lightroom Classic for my Adobe subscription that used to be £9.99/month now increased to £14.99/month.
My Yorkshire Thrift Gland twitches each month Adobe take £9.98.

I may give up photography when it goes over £10…..or at least altering my photos!

On a more serious note, I am finding the images out of the new Fuji don’t NEED any photoshopping. Exposure is spot on and it handles most situations admirably. The only thing I would miss with Photoshop is the superb masking options which enable selective targeting IF I do WANT to make an adjustment.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed Jul 30th, 2025 20:10
 
75th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4547
Status: 
Online
Graham Whistler wrote:
Similar shot JK, but all PS this time and much better quality. Lightroom is, as you know, included with PS, but Classic, no doubt, is better but I would not use it much, and the extra cost would be silly to spend if not used.

Click here to comment on this image.

Graham…I know you may disagree with me but I am not a fan of the total oof background with birds. 
I like to see some semblance of habitat in the background. I appreciate backgrounds can be distracting but without it the image becomes more of a studio portrait than a wildlife capture. 
Nevertheless that’s a lovely image of a GSW ..from GWP. ;-)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed Jul 30th, 2025 20:25
 
76th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4547
Status: 
Online
jk wrote:
Graham, 
Lightroom Classic, not Lightroom, is what you need as that uses local everything and saves back to your desired local drive!
Lightroom Classic is probably the best image cataloguing system I have ever used.

So does Photoshop? I have a WIP folder on my desktop and all my photos are “parked” there till complete, before being saved to an external SSD.
Cannot get excited in cloud storage of my images…old fashioned fart! :lol:



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Jul 31st, 2025 08:08
 
77th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
My Yorkshire Thrift Gland twitches each month Adobe take £9.98.

I may give up photography when it goes over £10…..or at least altering my photos!

On a more serious note, I am finding the images out of the new Fuji don’t NEED any photoshopping. Exposure is spot on and it handles most situations admirably. The only thing I would miss with Photoshop is the superb masking options which enable selective targeting IF I do WANT to make an adjustment.

They will probably increase it to £14.99 within the year as that is what they think is an acceptable amount. 
Probably 1 second of accountants time at Adobe :lol:



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Jul 31st, 2025 10:43
 
78th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1483
Status: 
Offline
Nuthatch giving me a look.


D8Z_2705 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

 




Posted: Thu Jul 31st, 2025 10:44
 
79th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4547
Status: 
Online
jk wrote:
They will probably increase it to £14.99 within the year as that is what they think is an acceptable amount. 
Probably 1 second of accountants time at Adobe :lol:

I thought you had recoiled from paying Adobe anything and we’re using some other package?

It a moot point, but I only stopped using Affinity because it wouldn’t open Sony raw files properly.  I haven’t tried the Fuji files on there…they may be ok. 

It’s not the monthly amount persay that irritates me, it’s the fact I don’t use PS from one month to the next. If I go on there ….say 4 or 5 months ( after holidays) a year, I am effectively paying 2 to 3 x the price.
Bring back the CD. :whip:



The older I get the more Yorkshire I become.

Needed to replace a vertical blind runner for patio doors. The blind supplier wanted £148 to replace it. 
Went on line and bought the track for £35. Fitted into same clips in 30secs.

I wanted to change the entry door locks to thumb locks ( we keep leaving keys insitu stopping opening from outside) 
Double glazing men came down measured up 2 locks. Quoted £152 for supply and fitting 2 new locks.
Went on line ….£12 each. I literally fitted them both while the kettle boiled.

I know in business they have to make a living…been there got the tee shirt. 
But since the pandemic (and Brexit) people are just taking the p!



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Jul 31st, 2025 10:59
 
80th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4547
Status: 
Online
Iain wrote:
Nuthatch giving me a look.


D8Z_2705 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

What’s all this? Posting bird photos on a bird thread? :lol:

Sorry for my ranting thread drift.


Cheeky little bird. I do like seeing birds in atypical poses to their normal stances.  Good capture :thumbs:



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 2014     Current time is 22:45 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography > Bird Photography 2025 Top

Users viewing this topic Graham Whistler

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0905 seconds (73% database + 27% PHP). 88 queries executed.