This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It's Geminid Meteor Shower Time Again   -   Page   2 | |
13th - 14th December 2015 | Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Thu Dec 10th, 2015 05:00 |
|
11th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Robert wrote:In good conditions the D200 has been fine for my needs. The resolution is more than adequate and the images I have obtained with it have been perfectly satisfying but for stuff which is much more demanding like night time photography, which I haven't really been interested in before it has always been acknowledged the early cameras, like the D1 and D2xx cameras lacked the capacity to produce the goods. The D300 performance might surprise you even in good light..... Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 21 times)
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 03:04 |
|
12th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Lovely Camelia Eric. Perhaps the D300 captures a greater dynamic range and processes the image better than the D200. I always found D200 images benefited from tweaking the levels, that has always been my first adjustment after opening almost any image from the D200. Looking forward to getting out in the field with the D300s and see what it can really do.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 10:09 |
|
13th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Robert wrote:Lovely Camelia Eric. Having seen that image again...I might go out and buy another D300s. ![]() ![]() Here's another it took.....with Jan at the helm.... Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 14 times)
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 10:12 |
|
14th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
And just to round off the nature series...some ornithology... Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 15 times)
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 14:23 |
|
15th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote:Having seen that image again...I might go out and buy another D300s. That doesn't look anything like Jan? ![]() But it's a lovely photo! So is the ornithology... So now I have the D300s I am going to take lovely photo's like those... Mmmm.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 14:58 |
|
16th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Do you know? Looking back at the d300 shots makes me realise it was a really good photography period for me. Not sure if it was the D300 ((I did have the D3 at the same time) or just happier times? It's made me want to double my effort with the D750.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 15:07 |
|
17th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Back on topic... Question...why do you use 50mm lens for these shots? Surely that just means cropping?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 15:26 |
|
18th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
I still have my D300 but I use it in my underwater housing. I wast thinking that a D7200 would be rather nice but D300S units that I am watching are much cheaper and probably of more use to me as I can possibly get it to do video underwater.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 16:14 |
|
19th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote:Back on topic... It's that or the Nikkor D 20mm f2.8 but that was on the D200, perhaps, looking back I should have had the 20mm on the D300... I wanted a wider view to stand a chance of catching a meteor, they can occur anywhere in the sky, in fact, apparently the radiant point isn't the best place to point the camera. I just kept pointing the cameras at the clearest area of the sky. I didn't want to use the zooms because they are so slow and would need to be stopped down a bit to avoid CA. To use the 180 or 300 would reduce the odds of capturing a meteor to almost zero. A fisheye would be better but everything would be tiny, any meteor would be so small it would be difficult to spot them.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Dec 12th, 2015 03:39 |
|
20th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
The 20mm will give you x4 area of sky captured compared with the 50mm.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 1267 Current time is 10:31 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > It's Geminid Meteor Shower Time Again | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |