This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
It's Geminid Meteor Shower Time Again   -   Page   2
13th - 14th December 2015  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Thu Dec 10th, 2015 05:00
 
11th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
In good conditions the D200 has been fine for my needs. The resolution is more than adequate and the images I have obtained with it have been perfectly satisfying but for stuff which is much more demanding like night time photography, which I haven't really been interested in before it has always been acknowledged the early cameras, like the D1 and D2xx cameras lacked the capacity to produce the goods.

To my mind we are moving into new photographic territory here, these fairly clean and detailed images in almost complete darkness would never have been possible in the days of film, or not easily. To some degree this is why I have not had much interest in photography in poor light, my mind has always been attuned to the idea that you only take good photographs in GOOD light. Fifty odd years of conditioning takes a little effort to overcome and I will still try to make good light photographs.

Whether the D300s will produce better images of flowers in good conditions remains to be seen but I don't expect to feel the need to re-take many, if any of my botanic photographs.

It may enable me to take some which I have struggled with because they are under a heavy canopy, in the short dull days of the winter months like some of the Rhododendrons at Muncaster. I definitely want to revisit one particular bush which has up to now defeated all my attempts to get good images of it's flowers, although I think it might take the D3 to conquer that one! :thumbsup:

Considering I have never used a D300 before, I managed quite easily in almost total darkness, to work the back buttons to access the menu and display buttons although perhaps some tactile difference would be welcome to differentiate the two display zoom buttons which would help when working by feel. A single pip on the zoom in button and multiple pips on the zoom out.


The D300 performance might surprise you even in good light.....

Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 21 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 03:04
 
12th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Lovely Camelia Eric.

Perhaps the D300 captures a greater dynamic range and processes the image better than the D200. I always found D200 images benefited from tweaking the levels, that has always been my first adjustment after opening almost any image from the D200.

Looking forward to getting out in the field with the D300s and see what it can really do.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 10:09
 
13th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Lovely Camelia Eric.

Perhaps the D300 captures a greater dynamic range and processes the image better than the D200. I always found D200 images benefited from tweaking the levels, that has always been my first adjustment after opening almost any image from the D200.

Looking forward to getting out in the field with the D300s and see what it can really do.


Having seen that image again...I might go out and buy another D300s.


:lol::lol:


Here's another it took.....with Jan at the helm....

Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 14 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 10:12
 
14th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
And just to round off the nature series...some ornithology...

Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 15 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 14:23
 
15th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:

Having seen that image again...I might go out and buy another D300s.


:lol::lol:


Here's another it took.....with Jan at the helm....


That doesn't look anything like Jan? :lol:

But it's a lovely photo!

So is the ornithology...

So now I have the D300s I am going to take lovely photo's like those... Mmmm.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 14:58
 
16th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Do you know? Looking back at the d300 shots makes me realise it was a really good photography period for me. Not sure if it was the D300 ((I did have the D3 at the same time) or just happier times?

It's made me want to double my effort with the D750.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 15:07
 
17th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Back on topic...

Question...why do you use 50mm lens for these shots? Surely that just means cropping?



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 15:26
 
18th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
I still have my D300 but I use it in my underwater housing.
I wast thinking that a D7200 would be rather nice but D300S units that I am watching are much cheaper and probably of more use to me as I can possibly get it to do video underwater.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Dec 11th, 2015 16:14
 
19th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Back on topic...

Question...why do you use 50mm lens for these shots? Surely that just means cropping?


It's that or the Nikkor D 20mm f2.8 but that was on the D200, perhaps, looking back I should have had the 20mm on the D300... I wanted a wider view to stand a chance of catching a meteor, they can occur anywhere in the sky, in fact, apparently the radiant point isn't the best place to point the camera. I just kept pointing the cameras at the clearest area of the sky.

I didn't want to use the zooms because they are so slow and would need to be stopped down a bit to avoid CA.

To use the 180 or 300 would reduce the odds of capturing a meteor to almost zero. A fisheye would be better but everything would be tiny, any meteor would be so small it would be difficult to spot them.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sat Dec 12th, 2015 03:39
 
20th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
The 20mm will give you x4 area of sky captured compared with the 50mm.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1267     Current time is 10:31 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > It's Geminid Meteor Shower Time Again Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0590 seconds (79% database + 21% PHP). 84 queries executed.