This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  ...  Next Page Last Page  
Bird Photography   -   Page   25
Nikon DSLRs and Lenses for bird photography  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat Jul 28th, 2018 14:25
 
241st Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4566
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Love the inky blackness of the background Eric.
Did you notice the bee on the top flower (just its rear)?

Love the single eye spot on the butterfly wing.


I missed that bee, Jk.

There was one flying in bottom right corner ....but I cropped it out as it was too near frame edge and distracting. :lol:

Attachment: C6496DC3-907A-4567-8BF0-FDFE3EC042E0.jpeg (Downloaded 44 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sat Jul 28th, 2018 14:30
 
242nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4566
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
So you've gone for the 80-400 then.

Yes Iain.

I managed to pick up a grade 9 used model at WEX for £1000 cheaper than a new one! The butterfly was one of the first test images.

I want to fully compare IQ with my 300P lens...at 300 of course... before 14day return runs out. Just in case there was a fault the previous owner discovered and WEX didn't. ;-)

At 400mm it seems to be ok....

Attachment: 0D52127F-72AD-4C8E-9A2A-E1D83CB0C21F.jpeg (Downloaded 47 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sat Jul 28th, 2018 14:52
 
243rd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4566
Status: 
Offline
Another at 400mm

Attachment: 0BB66CBD-1A0E-461C-9250-728F3203C8F6.jpeg (Downloaded 45 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2018 01:52
 
244th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1936
Status: 
Offline
Starting to look good but you can do better now you have the right lens and your good skills!



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2018 03:16
 
245th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
The lens seems good, one must wonder why the PO disposed of the lens...

I can't help but notice the perch peg on the feeder appears to be aluminium, might it not be more comfortable for the birds if you used a bit of round wood like a twig, drilled up the centre and slid over the aluminium perch with a little glue to keep it from rotating? Just a thought... The bird seems to be clenching the aluminium peg very tightly.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2018 03:57
 
246th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4566
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
The lens seems good, one must wonder why the PO disposed of the lens...

I can't help but notice the perch peg on the feeder appears to be aluminium, might it not be more comfortable for the birds if you used a bit of round wood like a twig, drilled up the centre and slid over the aluminium perch with a little glue to keep it from rotating? Just a thought... The bird seems to be clenching the aluminium peg very tightly.


I asked WEX the same question!!

They said they were experiencing a lot of people switching to mirrorless.

You can imagine my response (if that were true) .:lol:

The lens is totally unmarked and all the contents eg straps and pouch, unused. It had all the impressions of someone who bought it and never bothered to use it....unless they did and found something wrong with it? That's why I have to try it out exhaustively next week before 14day cooling off period, 'warms up'.

It's funny you mention the birds grip on the perch. It had just lost its grip on a sunflower seed it was sandwiching between its claws. The claws were interlocked round each other and the seed in manner that made me wonder if it was gripping the perch at all.

The perches are aluminium for hygiene. As they are easier to clean which is important to stop diseases crossing between different species. That's the official story of course.....I never wash the branches of the tree it's hanging in.
o.O

Attachment: 5F02EDA6-F898-4817-97B2-A1BB76376463.jpeg (Downloaded 50 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2018 08:28
 
247th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1486
Status: 
Offline
They look ok Eric. There are people that buy a lens like that because they think they are going to use it but then find it sits in the bag for months on end and so get rid of it

 




Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2018 10:58
 
248th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4566
Status: 
Offline
Graham Whistler wrote:
Starting to look good but you can do better now you have the right lens and your good skills!

I've now satisfied myself the 'half price' 80-400 is ok, so I will be keeping it for now.

:thumbs:

I would however say that when using the 1.4x tc I have to stop down to f11 to keep the quality....f8 is (no surprise) not quite as sharp as without the tc. The images are also not quite as good at 300mm setting with the tc, when compared with the 300mm P lens and the tc.

But this has always been my experience...tcs are best with primes.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Jul 29th, 2018 14:13
 
249th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1486
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
Starting to look good but you can do better now you have the right lens and your good skills!

I've now satisfied myself the 'half price' 80-400 is ok, so I will be keeping it for now.

:thumbs:

I would however say that when using the 1.4x tc I have to stop down to f11 to keep the quality....f8 is (no surprise) not quite as sharp as without the tc. The images are also not quite as good at 300mm setting with the tc, when compared with the 300mm P lens and the tc.

But this has always been my experience...tcs are best with primes.


I would have to agree with that last bit.

 




Posted: Mon Jul 30th, 2018 09:37
 
250th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6985
Status: 
Offline
Sounds like you got a great bargain Eric.

Sometimes people just dont get on with a particular lens.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1530     Current time is 16:54 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Bird Photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1341 seconds (84% database + 16% PHP). 86 queries executed.