Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I am about to embark of a large task of photographing much of my collection of slides and negatives*.

What is to be done with the old material, destroy it to save space, or put it in boxes and store as backup.


*Duplicates, poor IQ and boring images excepted.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4428
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
I am about to embark of a large task of photographing much of my collection of slides and negatives*.

What is to be done with the old material, destroy it to save space, or put it in boxes and store as backup.


*Duplicates, poor IQ and boring images excepted.

I've kept all my negatives and trannies ( and edited movie film rolls) in sealed boxes in the loft. Not ideal ....but am I really going to use or work them up ever again??? I've got selected prints that were used in exhibitions and portfolios. EVERYTHING has been digitised. Sadly, much was done years ago when scanning quality was not as good as today. But I ain't doing it again.

All the digitised images are on external hard drives and we are working through them making hard decisions about individual worth...a little weeding so to speak to keep meaningful searching the archive sensible.

Of course all my commercial work is stored on other hard drives...in case customers coming knocking again :thumbs:

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Have been photographing slides my father took in 1965 for his lectures on flowers.

Thank heavens for dust on the slides, gives me something to focus on! LOL

The range of exposure on the Ectachrome's is alarming, I am going to try bracketing the exposure to try to get something better out of the slides, taken in bright sunlight with heavy shadows. The EV range of the film must have only been a third of the EV range it was trying to record..

This D800 is a dream, loving it, live view really works, can zoom in on tiny detail, brilliant.

Am sat on a stool feeding slides into the holder and snapping away quite merrily! :thumbs:

Just experimenting at present, need to set up a solid bench.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1410
Status: 
Offline
I've done the same as Eric. I have a pile of boxes that would take weeks to scan in to the computer.

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I took about 35 exposures yesterday evening. This morning I ran them into Lightroom, I was very impressed how quickly Lr dealt with them, they are NEF's, between 44 and 50 Mb each, I have created HDR's of several of the short sets which I created trying to discover the exposure range of each slide, usually 3 exposures per slide, not proper bracketing but me guessing each end of the range with one in the middle. Lr created the HDR's quite quickly, I am very impressed how lively the handling of these enormous files is. It doesn't seem any slower that it is with D3 NEF files.

Black flowers in shade with bright orange centres in sunlight would be a challenge even now, let alone with chrome's

Maybe it's the payoff for building such a powerhouse MacPro in the first place.

Maybe with more images per stack it will slow it down but I haven't really noticed that with the D3 NEF's. What does slow it down is poor images and differences in framing, but it still manages to come up with a solution.

What I'm not so happy about is the HDR output is .dng and about 150Mb per image. Not sure what that is all about, it's still the same resolution and essentially the same image, I think it's a fixed image, in other words not reversible, so I don't quite see why it should be so large. Need to look into that urgently.


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0384 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 56 queries executed.