Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1411
Status: 
Offline
Has anyone tried this combination and if so what was the results?

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1411
Status: 
Offline
I've kind of answered my own question with a bit of digging and the answer seems to be not great.

amazing50

 

Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
I have the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and have tried it with a Nikon 2x and 2 other converters with a D610.

In all cases the images with the TC were of lower quality than cropping an identical image from the lens itself.

Problem with all TC's is that they magnify all the defects in the parent lens, by the square of their magnification, and add in allignment tolerances etc.

They may work with older DSLRs, but the newer sensors are too much for them.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4435
Status: 
Offline
I can add another dimension... I tried this converter on my 80-200 AFS f2.8.

Sold the converter...it just amplified inherent weaknesses not noticeable when using the lens normally.

In my experience, converters should only be used with primes.

Even then, I never like going beyond 1.4x with any converter.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
I have the Nikon 70-200 f2.8 AFS VR and the Kenk DG300 Plus x2 converter. I bought the Nikon 400mm f2.8 AFS VR, does that tell you the story.
It is like Eric says better used on primes e.g. Nikon 300mm f2.8 and 400mm f2.8 where it performs very well with little degradation.

amazing50

 

Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
With your primes, does it give a better image with the converter, than a cropped prime?

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
It is close but I actually think that the TC works for Nikon 300, Nikon 400 primes and 500mm mirror lens. It is better than a crop of a 12MP image from D300, D700, D3, D3s but I havent tested with D600 or D800 cameras.

amazing50

 

Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
Just did a quick test with a 90mm macro and the results were thumbs down for my 2 converters with the D610.

The only positive I've had with this was shooting my D5100 n the Tamron 150-600.

There the images were better than cropped D610 from the same tripod location.

Here the crop from the D610 was 9mp while the D5300 was 16mp. Set to DX the D600 is 10.3 mg pix.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4435
Status: 
Offline
amazing50 wrote:
Just did a quick test with a 90mm macro and the results were thumbs down for my 2 converters with the D610.

The only positive I've had with this was shooting my D5100 n the Tamron 150-600.

There the images were better than cropped D610 from the same tripod location.

Here the crop from the D610 was 9mp while the D5300 was 16mp. Set to DX the D600 is 10.3 mg pix.

I've used the 2x converter on the D3 with a 300mm Nikon prime. The image was better than cropping the D3 image...just.

Using 1.4xTC the crop was no different!

I came to the conclusion that the 12mp of the D3 was the limiting factor when it came to heavy cropping.

I've gotten rid of ALL my TCs.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4435
Status: 
Offline
amazing50 wrote:
Just did a quick test with a 90mm macro and the results were thumbs down for my 2 converters with the D610.

The only positive I've had with this was shooting my D5100 n the Tamron 150-600.

There the images were better than cropped D610 from the same tripod location.

Here the crop from the D610 was 9mp while the D5300 was 16mp. Set to DX the D600 is 10.3 mg pix.

I've used the 2x converter on the D3 with a 300mm Nikon prime. The image was better than cropping the D3 image...just.

Using 1.4xTC the crop was no different!

I came to the conclusion that the 12mp of the D3 was the limiting factor when it came to heavy cropping.

I've gotten rid of ALL my TCs.

If I can't get a shot with 500mm and cropping, I need to walk closer.

Seems like it's time to upgrade the D3

amazing50

 

Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
I'll be selling my TCs shortly.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:

I've used the 2x converter on the D3 with a 300mm Nikon prime. The image was better than cropping the D3 image...just.

Using 1.4xTC the crop was no different!

I came to the conclusion that the 12mp of the D3 was the limiting factor when it came to heavy cropping.

I've gotten rid of ALL my TCs.

If I can't get a shot with 500mm and cropping, I need to walk closer.

Seems like it's time to upgrade the D3

That is my finding as well.
Nikon 300 and 400 with the Kenko DG300 Plus x2 and x3 provide some utility but if possible dont use. BTW quality of light and brightness does help. In gloomy UK results look poorer than in sunny Spain.


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0810 seconds (83% database + 17% PHP). 93 queries executed.