Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
Bob



Joined: Fri Jul 25th, 2025
Location: Stroud Glos., United Kingdom
Posts: 64
Status: 
Offline
Any particular aversions to either of these manufacturers?

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 7000
Status: 
Offline
I used to use Sigma and Tamron lenses in the days before AF came to all cameras and they were a reasonably good buy as they were close to Nikon quality.
AF has changed the landscape a bit as there were compatibility issues especially with Nikon, and possibly more so with Nikon now moving from F mount to Z mount.  I hd a Sigma 50-500 that was very good but I sold it to get my Nikon 400mm f2.8 AFS, now also sold.   The electronics patents are held by Nikon and so anything is a reverse engineered result.

That said, I believe that the 150-600 lenses from both Sigma and Tamron are excellent optically.  The equivalent Nikon offerings are wallet burning affairs!
The bird watchers here Iain, Jeff (Blackfox) will be able to give you feedback as well.

Bob



Joined: Fri Jul 25th, 2025
Location: Stroud Glos., United Kingdom
Posts: 64
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I used to use Sigma and Tamron lenses in the days before AF came to all cameras and they were a reasonably good buy as they were close to Nikon quality.
AF has changed the landscape a bit as there were compatibility issues especially with Nikon, and possibly more so with Nikon now moving from F mount to Z mount.  I hd a Sigma 50-500 that was very good but I sold it to get my Nikon 400mm f2.8 AFS, now also sold.   The electronics patents are held by Nikon and so anything is a reverse engineered result.

That said, I believe that the 150-600 lenses from both Sigma and Tamron are excellent optically.  The equivalent Nikon offerings are wallet burning affairs!
The bird watchers here Iain, Jeff (Blackfox) will be able to give you feedback as well.

Thanks JK. It's a minefield - buying something you haven't seen on the basis of a no-hassle return policy- pull the other one.........

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 7000
Status: 
Offline
Yes it is a minefield, especially if you cannot have a hands on before purchase.
Have you tried Clifton Cameras in Cheltenham?  They have given me good service when I have purchased from them.

chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1541
Status: 
Offline
I have always found Sigma customer service to be very helpful but I don't care for the rubbery surface finish on their lenses which goes tacky over time

Bob



Joined: Fri Jul 25th, 2025
Location: Stroud Glos., United Kingdom
Posts: 64
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Yes it is a minefield, especially if you cannot have a hands on before purchase.
Have you tried Clifton Cameras in Cheltenham?  They have given me good service when I have purchased from them.

AS iy happens, they are just up the road.I'll ring them tomorrow.

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0445 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 62 queries executed.