Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Take a deep breath before you read this...

http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2013/01/29/nikon-800mm-lens-gets-official-price-are-you-sitting-down/

richw



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 525
Status: 
Offline
I forwarded on to my wife pointing out it would be out just in time for my birthday!

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
I'm trying that myself :-)

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
Since I have the 400mm f2.8 AFS and the Kenro DG300 Pro x2 I will pass on this as my arms get feebler so I cant hand hold this all day it would be a waste for me to invest in this as I would need to carry either the tripod or the lens not both!,,
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Gilbert Sandberg

 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 196
Status: 
Offline
Tom,
What's the news in this link?
An earlier post elicted some choice comments:
http://www.nikondslr.uk/view_topic.php?id=509&forum_id=3&highlight=800mm

I still think the price is rather hefty, compared to the 600 AF-S lenses.
Reards, Gilebert

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
I dont really see any particular advantage of the 800 f5.6 over a 600mm f4 or 400mm f2.8 other than having a dedicated 800 lens as either of the two other lenses can achieve 1000/1200mm at f8 compared to the 1000mm f7 of the new lens.

I know that this 1/3 stop may mean that the AF performs better but I dont think it will make much difference under poor light conditions.

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
I thought I was reading "news" on a Web site.

Sorry if this is not - I had never seen a price this high and surely would have remembered it if I did - way out of my league :-)

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
Well it is news Tom but I think the price is seriously out of range for 99.99% of us. It is really for government departments, newpapers, agencies and similar to but these lenses. I would be surprised if Nikon sell a 100 of these lenses a year, in fact if they sell 500 in total then I would be surprised.

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Hardly worth making for that number of sales...

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Agreed Tom but many Nikkors must have been low volume sellers, mainly the extreme lenses wide and long. The PC lenses and the UV Nikkor which Nikon do still produce in their specialised products division I understand, at a price. In fact I think the UV Nikkor makes the new 800 lens look a bargain by comparison, size for size.

I think their policy is to make a good range of gear available knowing there is a market for good quality gear, retaining their foothold in the specialised optic market place.

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Well, that's how they got to 80,000,000 lenses sold :-) !!!

Ray Ninness

 

Joined: Sat Apr 7th, 2012
Location: Bedford, New Hampshire USA
Posts: 92
Status: 
Offline
Well I turned down the offer of a 400f2.8 non VR AF-S at an attractive price the other day!! It was still the beast I remembered, it was fresh back from a tune up by Nikon.. But my 200-400 spends much of it's life in the vault these days, sadly!!!

And I do understand your arm issues JK, I add my knees and back to the mix!!

:doh:

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Same here, Ray. But I just put the 200-400 in my car. Spring is just around the corner and I've driven by flocks of egrets that beg me to make a photo of them...

We'll see :-)

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6880
Status: 
Offline
Ray Ninness wrote: Well I turned down the offer of a 400f2.8 non VR AF-S at an attractive price the other day!! It was still the beast I remembered, it was fresh back from a tune up by Nikon.. But my 200-400 spends much of it's life in the vault these days, sadly!!!

And I do understand your arm issues JK, I add my knees and back to the mix!!

:doh:

Nice to see you posting again Ray.
Hope that you havent suffered too much in the winter storms.


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0980 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 101 queries executed.