| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6   |
|
|||||||
| I collected my new D200 Infra Red from Eric - Page 2 | |
| And made some test exposures - discussion | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Sat Aug 9th, 2014 17:10 |
|
11th Post |
jk
|
Robert wrote:jk wrote: The D300 is my underwater camera for macro, I have another old D70 for my wideangle underwater stuff. My D1x awaits your tender care for UV conversion. I am waiting to see what Nikon and Fuji have up their sleeves at Photokina in mid-September. If the D400 or the like comes then that works for me but if Fuji release the XPro2 then I may well dump almost all of my Nikon gear and go Fuji. To do that the XPro2 will need to have even better AF than the XT1 or as good AF speed as my Nikon D300 or D3 and also be 20-24MP, the XPro1 will then be converted to IR.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Aug 10th, 2014 07:04 |
|
12th Post |
Robert
|
jk wrote:My D1x awaits your tender care for UV conversion. My as new Philips 00 is at the ready! In the meantime having forgotten to save the 'Windfall' image I spent the morning creating this: Taken with D200IR with Nikkor 18-105 f3.5-5.6 VR Attachment: Oakdale IR C.jpg (Downloaded 53 times)
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Aug 10th, 2014 07:08 |
|
13th Post |
Robert
|
From this: Attachment: Oakdale as shot.jpg (Downloaded 58 times)
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Aug 10th, 2014 07:09 |
|
14th Post |
Robert
|
100% Crop in PS. Please bear in mind this image has been reduced in size by the forum software by about 50%. I haven't done side by side but I think the IR conversion has increased the D200 sharpness due the absence of an anti-aliasing filter. Cows legs (Top left) just defined on my screen at about three miles seems pretty good to me. Attachment: Oakdale IR 100% Crop.jpg (Downloaded 58 times)
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Aug 10th, 2014 07:25 |
|
15th Post |
Robert
|
The EXIF: Attachment: Oakdale EXIF.jpg (Downloaded 59 times)
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 11th, 2014 01:29 |
|
16th Post |
Robert
|
The pre-process settings in Lightroom 3.6: Attachment: Oakdale settings.jpg (Downloaded 53 times)
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 11th, 2014 16:57 |
|
17th Post |
Eric
|
Robert wrote:The pre-process settings in Lightroom 3.6: Robert, if you adjust the tint to -80/84 you will get a more sepia, less red, starting image, more akin to the D70. It can give a bluer result to the blues .when flipping channels.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 11th, 2014 17:08 |
|
18th Post |
Robert
|
Thanks Eric, another tip for my edufication! I rarely, if ever, touch the tint settings in Lightroom (usually a last resort when all else fails!!!) but I will give it a try next time. I have often wondered about varying the channel swap slightly to influence the final tones especially the sky. Perhaps my Victoria sponge of layers needs the channels switching slightly differently for each layer. Bit more blue for the sky etc... Just to help things along.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Aug 11th, 2014 18:48 |
|
19th Post |
Eric
|
Robert wrote:Thanks Eric, another tip for my edufication! I rarely, if ever, touch the tint settings in Lightroom (usually a last resort when all else fails!!!) but I will give it a try next time. Sorry forgot to mention my starting point. I found that starting from the default d200 settings left the converted image more in the cyan/ green area of blue as the starting (opposite) colour is this slightly red/magenta hue. By shifting the tint closer to yellow you are instead starting from the complimentary colour of blue. The interesting thing is that you don't actually need to calibrate the camera WB. If you just shoot on auto...then set the temperature to 2000 and the tint to -80 it should give you same result. I just remembered this discovery.... I should do this on Fuji!!!!!!!!!!! 
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Aug 12th, 2014 18:13 |
|
20th Post |
jk
|
What was the replacement filter that was fitted to the D200 ? The RAW rendering looks different to the images from my D70 (720nm filter fitted) which seems to produce a browner result SOOC. Was it 720, 660, 590 nm or some other?
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1072 Current time is 11:25 | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Specialised Photography - Macro, UV, IR, Underwater > I collected my new D200 Infra Red from Eric | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0653 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 85 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0653 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 85 queries executed.