Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
When looking at images taken with the D7200 and the D6100 in Adobe Bridge i get no metadata and I can't work out why.
It's bound to be something simple that I'm missing.

Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
NEF or JPEG? Should make no difference...

I usually check EXIF in Photoshop or Lightroom, you get a fuller report (more data) from Photoshop. Have never used Bridge to check metadata, did not know it was possible.

The only time I have used Bridge was to open JPEG's in the RAW processor ADR? Which gives some finer controls over tones and white balance, together with it's batch processing features.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
Thats the funny thing Robert I can get the metadata in LR and PS so I would expect it to be in BR.

I use BR a bit but it's not a hardship to look at MD in LR.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
I dont use Bridge but I do know it is meant to show metadata. Have you looked at the tabs and preferences.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
Ive looked but can't see anything. I've turned the Mac off now but will have a look tomorrow.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Here you go.

Attachment: Screen Shot 2015-11-21 at 22.59.12.jpg (Downloaded 21 times)

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
Got it working, it must have been in the settings as I reset them and it's there.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
So you went for the D610, Iain? I would be interested to get your perspective on how the D7200 compares to the D610.. regarding the buffer speed and general responsiveness.

Coming from the D3 to the D750 I do feel that the D3 was faster, slicker and did everything quicker. Of course it only has 12mp which meant smaller files to handle. It's this comparative 'sluggishness' that disappoints on the D750. Of course it may just be the difference between Dbodies and Dxx bodies.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
So far I have found the D610 to be a bit slower than the D7200 in focus speed. The buffer, as yet I have not hit it on either, I have a 1000x Sd card in both which seems to keep me off the buffer.
I prefer the handling of th D7200 I don't know why as they are both of similar size and layout. The D610 is about a stop or so better at high ISO.
As for IQ surprisenley I can't see much difference.
It's still early days, I think more use of both is needed.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
So you went for the D610, Iain? I would be interested to get your perspective on how the D7200 compares to the D610.. regarding the buffer speed and general responsiveness.

Coming from the D3 to the D750 I do feel that the D3 was faster, slicker and did everything quicker. Of course it only has 12mp which meant smaller files to handle. It's this comparative 'sluggishness' that disappoints on the D750. Of course it may just be the difference between Dbodies and Dxx bodies.

Eric, can you comment further on this sluggishness of the D750.
I'm likely to get a D750 or D810 in the new year but I feel that the D810 is too many MP especially as I have a D800. The D750 has some nice improvements over my D600.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
So you went for the D610, Iain? I would be interested to get your perspective on how the D7200 compares to the D610.. regarding the buffer speed and general responsiveness.

Coming from the D3 to the D750 I do feel that the D3 was faster, slicker and did everything quicker. Of course it only has 12mp which meant smaller files to handle. It's this comparative 'sluggishness' that disappoints on the D750. Of course it may just be the difference between Dbodies and Dxx bodies.

Eric, can you comment further on this sluggishness of the D750.
I'm likely to get a D750 or D810 in the new year but I feel that the D810 is too many MP especially as I have a D800. The D750 has some nice improvements over my D600.

It's difficult to quantify...and maybe down to the card I was using. I was shooting a kitchen with tricky lighting ( darkworktops, light woodwork with lots of LED spots). It's often a recipe for burntout highlight and distracting reflections so I bracket heavily and rob elements from each. EricHDR. Lol

Anyway, the focus acquisition was slightly slower than the D3. (Same lens) Not major or any consequence when shooting statics. It did make me wonder how it would perform in low light action situations.

The main issue was the speed writing files. I repeat it may have been a slow card ( must check that tomorrow) but if I shot a burst of 5, then another burst of 5, moved the tripod slightly and shot another set of five...the last couple of shots ie 14/15 wouldn't fire for a couple of seconds. The file writing light seemed to be permanently on and it stayed lit for some time after I stopped shooting.

I just got the feeling when challenging it, the D750 went at its own pace. Somehow the D3 always seemed to keep pace with my needs.

Must look at that card...I just remembered Iused the best ones in the Fuji ...and the wife nicked some for video use. She may have left me with dross. Lol

I would put the D750 on par with the Fuji XT for performance.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
It may be your card Eric as I found the D7200 slow but was using a class 10 600x but now using Lexar 1000x it ok.
I'll have to try some long bursts as I tend to do short bursts.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
It may be your card Eric as I found the D7200 slow but was using a class 10 600x but now using Lexar 1000x it ok.
I'll have to try some long bursts as I tend to do short bursts.

Have ordered a couple of those cards to replace mine. Will see if that changes my view of the D750.

Thinking about it....most of my fast cards were for the D3 ...ie compactflash! SD cards were bought for Jan's less taxing cameras. I got some reasonably fast ones for the Fuji...but then Jan wanted them for video!!

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

Oh, this comment on the same article suggests my buying the UHS II Lexar is NOT going to help!!!

"The most current version of SDHC UHS-II can write at 280 MB/sec. The newly announced Nikon D750 has no support for UHS-II, so it would be pointless to try to use one of those cards. In addition, there is internal bus speed limitations too, just like what the user at Flickr noticed. If manufacturer uses cheaper parts or slower bus, then newer and faster cards won't do anything":thumbsdown:

I do find all this card speed, bus speed and the varying configurations the manufacturers use for different models confusing and frankly irritating. I just want the camera to take pictures at my pace! Maybe performance is assigned just to the D4 range?
o.O

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

The D5 will be here in 2016. I think you have itchy wallet syndrome! Please send D750 to me for testing, I will send you back a D3S.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Eric wrote:

Oh, this comment on the same article suggests my buying the UHS II Lexar is NOT going to help!!!

"The most current version of SDHC UHS-II can write at 280 MB/sec. The newly announced Nikon D750 has no support for UHS-II, so it would be pointless to try to use one of those cards. In addition, there is internal bus speed limitations too, just like what the user at Flickr noticed. If manufacturer uses cheaper parts or slower bus, then newer and faster cards won't do anything":thumbsdown:

I agree but if you get a SDHC-UHS-II card it will prove that the card is not the limiting factor. Also there will probably be an update of the firmware that will allow its use if the rest of the bus technology doesnt stop this.
If the card does work not in the D750 then it will in the XT1. :-)

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

The D5 will be here in 2016. I think you have itchy wallet syndrome! Please send D750 to me for testing, I will send you back a D3S.

Yorkshire wallets are coated with anti itch cream from the outset.
;-)

Not planning on any other purchase till I have thinned out all my existing gear and decided if it's Nikon of Fuji for me.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
Eric wrote:

Oh, this comment on the same article suggests my buying the UHS II Lexar is NOT going to help!!!

"The most current version of SDHC UHS-II can write at 280 MB/sec. The newly announced Nikon D750 has no support for UHS-II, so it would be pointless to try to use one of those cards. In addition, there is internal bus speed limitations too, just like what the user at Flickr noticed. If manufacturer uses cheaper parts or slower bus, then newer and faster cards won't do anything":thumbsdown:

I agree but if you get a SDHC-UHS-II card it will prove that the card is not the limiting factor. Also there will probably be an update of the firmware that will allow its use if the rest of the bus technology doesnt stop this.
If the card does not work in the D750 then it will in the XT1. :-)

There you go with the 'glass half ful' position....just when I was having negative waves.
:lol:

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

The D5 will be here in 2016. I think you have itchy wallet syndrome! Please send D750 to me for testing, I will send you back a D3S.

I'll swap a mint D610 for you D3s ;-)

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
This is what I'm using Eric
https://www.7dayshop.com/64gb-sd-cards/lexar-professional-64gb-class-10-uhs-ii-1000x-speed-150mb-s-sdxc-flash-memory-card

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
This is what I'm using Eric
https://www.7dayshop.com/64gb-sd-cards/lexar-professional-64gb-class-10-uhs-ii-1000x-speed-150mb-s-sdxc-flash-memory-card

Yes that's what Ive ordered Iain...but its the revelation that the D750, one of Nikons newest body, currently cant take advantage of its UHS II speed and only works at UHS I rate, that makes me wonder if the camera itself has been 'knobbled' to prevent it out performing the more expensive models.

Maybe that's a bit farfetched....but its just a bit weird that a new camera isn't up with card developments?

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

The D5 will be here in 2016. I think you have itchy wallet syndrome! Please send D750 to me for testing, I will send you back a D3S.

I'll swap a mint D610 for you D3s ;-)

Form an orderly queue please...the jury is still out here.

:lol:

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
jk wrote:
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
I downloaded the D750 manual but nowhere (AFAIK) does it give buffer size in frames.

This article is very useful.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-dslr-buffer-capacity-comparison

Thanks JK, very interesting. Think I need a D4S. Lol

The D3 v D750 similarity suggests that my observation may be down to a card issue. We shall see.

The D5 will be here in 2016. I think you have itchy wallet syndrome! Please send D750 to me for testing, I will send you back a D3S.

I'll swap a mint D610 for you D3s ;-)

If it had the same AF unit in the D610 as the D750/D800/D810 then I would say yes maybe! :lol:
I keep thinking that what I really want is a D3X but is it really? I want the 24MP and the D3S performance but it is only a little better than the D3! Maybe I should have got a D4.




Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
You'll not get that with a D3x and you'll have limited iso range.

Eric, maybe they are keeping that for the D5 and D400. :lol:

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Yes it seems the D750 gives me the MP I want, but the D810 has a better control layout for me, but I then take the hit on too many MP.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
Nobody produces a camera that is perfect for everybody, so we all end up having to make do with some things that we see as weak points but these might be strong points for others.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
Nobody produces a camera that is perfect for everybody, so we all end up having to make do with some things that we see as weak points but these might be strong points for others.
That is very true.
I need to decide exactly what features I can drop and those that I cannot.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Eric, please can you check for me whether or not your D750 has the Playback zoom feature. It is present in D3, D3S, D3X, D810 and D800. It allows the OK button of the multiway selector switch when pressed to zoom (x100% usually) the magnification of the selected image. Thanks.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1347
Status: 
Offline
I would think it has as the D7200 has.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric, please can you check for me whether or not your D750 has the Playback zoom feature. It is present in D3, D3S, D3X, D810 and D800. It allows the OK button of the multiway selector switch when pressed to zoom (x100% usually) the magnification of the selected image. Thanks.

Yes it does.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Thanks very much.
Well that means a D750 has that function so it is not a differentiator.
If it had a 10 pin connector then it would be so easy.
It has two SD cards which is a bonus over the D810.

Is it possible to lock the shutter speed and/or aperture? I can do it on D3 so easily but less easily on the D800/D810 as I need to use a menu entry or fn button.


Traditionally or by past history I buy my new cameras in January so my itchy wallet is starting to move!

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4189
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Thanks very much.
Well that means a D750 has that function so it is not a differentiator.
If it had a 10 pin connector then it would be so easy.
It has two SD cards which is a bonus over the D810.

Is it possible to lock the shutter speed and/or aperture? I can do it on D3 so easily but less easily on the D800/D810 as I need to use a menu entry or fn button.


Traditionally or by past history I buy my new cameras in January so my itchy wallet is starting to move!

Don't think it's got the lock. So you can save your money. ;-)

But I rarely used it on th D3. Only when shooting in confined space when there was a risk I might knock the aperture setting.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
I use it on my D3 and D3S to make sure that I keep the same settings as I shoot in full Manual mode.

Not an absolute must have but bloody useful!

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
I would think it has as the D7200 has.
That is useful to know. Thanks Iain.

Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Not an absolute must have but bloody useful!
Gaffer tape? :lol:

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6830
Status: 
Offline
Induces stickyness on my cameras!
:lol:


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2956 seconds (71% database + 29% PHP). 254 queries executed.