Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Topic closed
AuthorPost
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
The rumoured Z9 camera has been seen in Tokyo at the Olympics.
https://www.dpreview.com/news/0551947798/images-confirm-nikon-z9-is-being-tested-at-the-olympics-first-look-camera-back-side

It has little interest to me as I think that the size and weight compared to my Z7 will be a big increase.  I am sure it has a place but not in my camera bag.

Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1346
Status: 
Offline
I heard they were going to be tried there.

novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Looks nice...but why all the secrecy...is it not a finished product yet?

Wondering about the price...

GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 293
Status: 
Offline
novicius wrote:
Looks nice...but why all the secrecy...is it not a finished product yet?

Wondering about the price...
Price will be similar to that of the D6 I understand, mortgage territory!

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
GeoffR wrote:
Price will be similar to that of the D6 I understand, mortgage territory! :doh:
Out of pensioner reach.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
I want a FTZ mkii which has a screwdriver motor for older AF lenses.
No rumours of such a thing coming from anyone much less Nikon who want you to buy Z lenses.

novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Nikon has announced that they`ve stopped the production of Rifle Scopes, that`s a good chunk of money down the drain , ´cause them were selling well, yet rumours about dwindeling camera sales are persistent,seemingly, Nikon is taking the same route Olympus took thirty years ago, smaller camera and smaller lenses... I hope the recipe works for them , personally, I will stay with my current system, I prefer the Slr over anything else and have a good amount of lenses incl. AF-S ones, but that Z-9 does look NICE !...but I`d rather invest in another lens, 2nd.hand AF-S lenses are dwindling in prices and I am tempted, but I have Demands, them Must have VR, or I wrinkle my nose..:-)

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
Well here you are the latest rumour mill fall out of what the new Z9 specifications are.

https://nikonrumors.com/2021/08/10/new-nikon-z9-monster-specs-leaked-announcement-expected-in-the-next-two-months-nikon-basically-combined-the-d6-and-d850-and-made-it-mirrorless.aspx/

8256 x 5504px resolution that confirms a 45MP stacked sensor (it is interesting to note that Canon decided to go with a 24MP sensor for their R3 camera).
    The Z9 will be capable of up to 120 fps in a lower res file size (6Mb I think). Some reports even indicated 160 fps!
    Built-in GPS – probably GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System).
    The Z9 will use the same battery as D6. There will be also a new 18-type battery (EN-EL18x) that can be charged by the camera's USB-C.
    The sensor has multi leaf blade protective shutter that auto covers sensor when switched off/changing lens to stop dust and dirt on naked sensor.
    The Z9 will have car autofocus in addition to animal and people AF as well as low light -7 EV.
    Improved 3D tracking.
    Improved articulated screen that even works in portrait mode – it is a completely new design.
    New style locking flap for the two CFExpress memory cards.
    Third joystick/selector added to use whilst camera close face and shooting.
    Many new menu features to tweak and match your shooting style.
    The shutter release sound level can be adjusted from silent to loud so you can still get that D6 machine gun sound
    The official announcement is expected in the next 2 months, but do not expect many cameras to ship before the end of the year. Because of part shortage, the waiting time for the Z9 is expected to be very long.

GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 293
Status: 
Offline
Far more resolution than I need but, aside from the articulated screen, the rest looks useful. Unfortunately the cost of switching would be prohibitive and the cost of CF Express cards simply adds to that. If you thought XQD cards were expensive don't even look at CFExpress!

I'll be looking out for used D5 or D6 bodies, if the prices ever come down enough.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
Going to need to ask Rishi to give pensioners a bigger that inflation pay rise!

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
More rumours about a revised FTZ adapter that will allow AF-D lenses to autofocus on a Z camera as well as AF-S lenses.

From NikonRumors.com "I can now confirm that Nikon is indeed working on a new Nikon FTZ2 adapter – I received multiple tips from reliable sources. The new adapter will have a re-designed body (probably without the bump at the bott0m) and this should avoid problems when mounting Z cameras on a tripod or when using underwater housings. I am not sure if the new adapter will be announced together with the Z9 camera. Stay tuned for more details."


Read more: https://nikonrumors.com/#ixzz76HBT5flx

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
First real teaser from nikon about the Z9.
https://youtu.be/tCl4LWM4D9U

Nail your wallet down!

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
First real teaser from nikon about the Z9.
https://youtu.be/tCl4LWM4D9U

Nail your wallet down!
That looks like a big body for a Zcamera. More like a DSLR.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
I think it has the same battery as the D6.
It is not for me.  I dont want a camera larger than the Z7.

novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Nearly as big  as a D3, Then what`s the point..was it to be " modern " with having an EVF , or having a new lensline....not sure about Nikon`s strategy..heard they`ve changed management so mebbe it`s about change for the sake of change itself.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
Why indeed? I regard the 'need' for mirrorless to be more an issue of manufacturer desire like energy smart meters and hybrid motors.
Mirrorless is on the whole a series of compromises. 

The evf on the Sony A1 is the best I've seenbut it's still not the same as a DSLR viewfinder. Good enough but compromise 1
In common with other mirrorless bodies (except this Z9) the bodies are small. Not sure why when hands haven't changed size. Compromise 2
The lenses used with most mirrorless systems are still heavy DSLR versions. This means in use, mirrorless + lens is not much different to DSLR + lens. Compromise 3 (Only Fuji X system has light weight bodies AND lenses.)
Battery life is less than half of a DSLR. Compromise 4
The responsiveness (wake up, focus acquisition) of many mirrorless bodies is slower than a DSLR. Compromise 5


The Sony A1 is however very fast to focus and retain lock under moving subject situations.
It's mechanical shutter is very silent.that's even without going to silent mode!
So there is some hope things might improve in the areas where I feel we are being required to compromise.

Mybiggest disappointment with mirrorless is the meagre improvement in noise at relatively low iso levels. Not everyone wants 250,000iso. And if we did, there would be realistic expectations of some serious noise. 

But in the more typical overcast UK light, ISOs upto 6,000 are often necessary to allow faster shutter speeds and narrow apertures as the subject dictates.

For me the only reason I would contemplate changing systems (again) would be if a manufacturer manages to give iso 400 noise levels upto iso 6000. It would save a lot of faffing about using noise reduction software.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Why indeed? I regard the 'need' for mirrorless to be more an issue of manufacturer desire like energy smart meters and hybrid motors.
Mirrorless is on the whole a series of compromises. 

The evf on the Sony A1 is the best I've seenbut it's still not the same as a DSLR viewfinder. Good enough but compromise 1
In common with other mirrorless bodies (except this Z9) the bodies are small. Not sure why when hands haven't changed size. Compromise 2
The lenses used with most mirrorless systems are still heavy DSLR versions. This means in use, mirrorless + lens is not much different to DSLR + lens. Compromise 3 (Only Fuji X system has light weight bodies AND lenses.)
Battery life is less than half of a DSLR. Compromise 4
The responsiveness (wake up, focus acquisition) of many mirrorless bodies is slower than a DSLR. Compromise 5


The Sony A1 is however very fast to focus and retain lock under moving subject situations.
It's mechanical shutter is very silent.that's even without going to silent mode!
So there is some hope things might improve in the areas where I feel we are being required to compromise.

Mybiggest disappointment with mirrorless is the meagre improvement in noise at relatively low iso levels. Not everyone wants 250,000iso. And if we did, there would be realistic expectations of some serious noise. 

But in the more typical overcast UK light, ISOs upto 6,000 are often necessary to allow faster shutter speeds and narrow apertures as the subject dictates.

For me the only reason I would contemplate changing systems (again) would be if a manufacturer manages to give iso 400 noise levels upto iso 6000. It would save a lot of faffing about using noise reduction software.
I agree with all of your points except the first one about the OVF/EVF part.
With DSLR there is mirror blackout which is analogous to the blackout in mirrorless when it reads out the sensor.
The battery issue is a common problem with all electronic cameras.  Film cameras only needed power initially for the meter, then meter and film advance, then finally for meter, film advance and autofocus plus any TFT for menus.

chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1320
Status: 
Offline
I can't understand the need for EVF - why take light, convert it to electricity and then convert it back to light?

The only advantage, if it is one, is the removal of the mirror and associated noise / vibration / wear. To be honest my 610 is fairly quiet in Q mode.

Just because we CAN do something isn't a reason we NEED to do it. But there is something built into some humans that means they always need the latest whizz bang and manufacturers play on that to make their profits - why otherwise would Nikon have so many cameras and so many lenses?

GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 293
Status: 
Offline
The Z9 battery is a new version of the EN-EL18 that fits the D4, D5 and D6, great for the professional who only has to carry one battery type and charger. The battery drives the need for a vertical grip which then determines the overall size of the camera. The big battery should increase the number of frames per charge.

I know it happens but the black out when the mirror is raised has never bothered me, to the extent that I rarely even notice it, that may be because our eyes blank when we move them and our brains fill in the missing detail. The blackout from the mirror is usually very brief and I suspect our brains compensate, only at slower shutter speeds is there a problem.

Personally, I'd rather have a D5 than a Z9 and D5s are becoming more affordable.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
I can't understand the need for EVF - why take light, convert it to electricity and then convert it back to light?

The only advantage, if it is one, is the removal of the mirror and associated noise / vibration / wear. To be honest my 610 is fairly quiet in Q mode.

Just because we CAN do something isn't a reason we NEED to do it. But there is something built into some humans that means they always need the latest whizz bang and manufacturers play on that to make their profits - why otherwise would Nikon have so many cameras and so many lenses?
I couldn't agree more.

Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
I can't understand the need for EYF EYF???

I thought I knew most of the acronyms...

chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1320
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
EYF???

I thought I knew most of the acronyms...
Finger trouble, for Y read V .... it's me age, you know.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
Finger trouble, for Y read V .... it's me age, you know. I thought you were being polite and not gesticulating your disapproval

Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
Finger trouble, for Y read V .... it's me age, you know. I didn't click with the similarity of the characters...  If I suspect a typo I look at the adjacent characters on my keyboard.  I am totally unfamiliar with the Z series, I am following the thread partly in the hope of learning something, your 'Y' confused the heck out of me!

On a more serious note, I think we need to check what we type is accurate, many people will visit this thread expecting to learn something about the Z9 and some may go away confused?  It certain;y had me scratching my head! :hair:  :doh:

chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1320
Status: 
Offline
Lol - to confuse you even more I have corrected my original post .....

GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 293
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
I can't understand the need for EVF - why take light, convert it to electricity and then convert it back to light?

The only advantage, if it is one, is the removal of the mirror and associated noise / vibration / wear. To be honest my 610 is fairly quiet in Q mode.

Just because we CAN do something isn't a reason we NEED to do it. But there is something built into some humans that means they always need the latest whizz bang and manufacturers play on that to make their profits - why otherwise would Nikon have so many cameras and so many lenses?
The NEED is for the manufacturer because the alignment of mirrors, focus sensor and focusing screen is a skilled job and thus costly. A mirrorless camera doesn't need any alignment and thus doesn't require the skilled technician to do it. Since the Z9 is no cheaper than the D6 one must assume an increased profit margin.

Removing the mirror obviously removes the vibration and noise (actually the same thing just different frequencies). I am not sure that wear is as much of an issue as many think, especially in amateur hands.

Many commentators in the photographic press are so absolutely convinced of the superiority of the mirrorless camera over the SLR that they have closed their eyes to the disadvantages, battery life for example. Most of them are younger than I am and thus more disposed to accept the disadvantages in exchange for convenience. They will tell you that being able to see the effects of exposure compensation before shooting is essential, it isn't, anyone who uses or has used film will be experienced in judging the effect without seeing a preview simply because a preview isn't possible. Of course, if you want what the EVF offers you can switch but personally I prefer the freedom to shoot all day without the need to carry spare batteries.

Mirrorless is just another tool in the box, you can still do the job without it but sometimes it might make the job easier.

Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
Lol - to confuse you even more I have corrected my original post ..... I am easily confused.  :hammer;-)

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
I didn't click with the similarity of the characters...  If I suspect a typo I look at the adjacent characters on my keyboard.  I am totally unfamiliar with the Z series, I am following the thread partly in the hope of learning something, your 'Y' confused the heck out of me!

On a more serious note, I think we need to check what we type is accurate, many people will visit this thread expecting to learn something about the Z9 and some may go away confused?  It certain;y had me scratching my head! :hair:  :doh:
We are talking about the Z9 ?
But when considering a £multi thousand camera it's only right to consider what you get for your money.
Hence my post about the compromises to be made when switching from DSLR to mirrorless. Some of which call into question the whole ethos of mirrorless.

Of course as Geoff points out many younger people aren't coming to the mirrorless party with as many preconceived comparisons.

I previously considered the exposure preview an advantage, but have lately switched it off as it can be a distraction in low light. Far better to rely on ones experience on exposure setting which served us well during the predigital days.


But I am sure many will buy the Z9

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
Well I like or even prefer the EVF for some/most shooting but there are instances where the DSLR still wins which is why I havent moved totally to Fuji or Sony.
I really like the specs for the Sony cameras but I really dislike their menus.
I havent tried the A1 or latest A7R series cameras but all the ones I looked at about 5-6years ago the menus were horrible.  Designed by a monkey on crack!

The lenses are very nice but they should be as they have only just finished updating and extending the range.

Regarding future cameras.
I see no reason to upgrade to a Z9 or even a Z7ii.  What will come in Z8?

I am waiting for the Fuji XH2 and will decide whether I move totally to Fuji or just stick with what I have with a mix of Nikon and Fuji.  I actually have all I need in the Fuji and I prefer the XT3 to any camera since the Nikon F3, the D3S is close behind the XT3, really only due to it bulk and weight.


I must go and see if I can get a hands on with an A1.  
Eric, any chance of you coming down this way?  I know Land Rovers need a run out to keep them in good order.  My Discovery did 120k miles before I sold it, and it never missed a beat.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Well I like or even prefer the EVF for some/most shooting but there are instances where the DSLR still wins which is why I havent moved totally to Fuji or Sony.
I really like the specs for the Sony cameras but I really dislike their menus.
I havent tried the A1 or latest A7R series cameras but all the ones I looked at about 5-6years ago the menus were horrible.  Designed by a monkey on crack!

The lenses are very nice but they should be as they have only just finished updating and extending the range.

Regarding future cameras.
I see no reason to upgrade to a Z9 or even a Z7ii.  What will come in Z8?

I am waiting for the Fuji XH2 and will decide whether I move totally to Fuji or just stick with what I have with a mix of Nikon and Fuji.  I actually have all I need in the Fuji and I prefer the XT3 to any camera since the Nikon F3, the D3S is close behind the XT3, really only due to it bulk and weight.


I must go and see if I can get a hands on with an A1.  
Eric, any chance of you coming down this way?  I know Land Rovers need a run out to keep them in good order.  My Discovery did 120k miles before I sold it, and it never missed a beat.
The menu system on the A1 is entirely different to the previous Sony menus. For one thing it's vertical like most other cameras  
It's different to the Nikon but now more intuitive to follow ..apart from some of the Sony terminology and the sheer amount of options!!

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
That is good news.
Looks like I need to go get a hands on.

Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4186
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
That is good news.
Looks like I need to go get a hands on.
Good luck with that.  I believe they are still on preorder.

novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Why is the Z cf not being mentioned , here and on other fora  ??...it can not be due to it being an APS-C,...there are photogs who like the " long reach " it gives,or is the " retro " not retro enough ??

GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 293
Status: 
Offline
It is most unlikely to happen but, if somebody gave me £20,000 and told me I had to spend it on photographic equipment I would definitely consider the Z9 with the same lenses I currently have in F mount. I would also consider the D6 and upgrades of my current lenses. However, I might look at the Canon R3, the Panasonic full frame offerings and possibly even the Leica.

The fact is however that I actually like the cameras and lenses that I have and any change would be for the sake of change, possibly the worst reason.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
Oh dear Eric is not going to like this.
https://youtu.be/xQHfwi-omvw

Zero or almost zero eyepiece blackout.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
OK, It has arrived.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/9956913841/nikon-announces-z9-professional-mirrorless-camera

https://www.nikon.co.uk/en_GB/products/category_pages/digital_cameras/mirrorless/overview.page

46MP.
So basically an upgrade to the Z7/Z7ii and D850 with more professional features (built in GPS) and better video if you want it.

jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6828
Status: 
Offline
I am locking this thread as all comments can go in the new one about the Z9.

Go here.
https://nikondslr.uk/view_topic.php?id=1929&forum_id=2&jump_to=25791#p25791


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2831 seconds (72% database + 28% PHP). 230 queries executed.