This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
Sony Bridge Camera DSC-RX10   -   Page   3
Amazing quality results from a compact camera!  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 05:14
 
21st Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 14:39
 
22nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.


For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR.

My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 15:44
 
23rd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Funny that...

Occasionally I even go to the extent of using my 300 f2.8 wide open to reduce the DoF, I usually seek to isolate the flower from it's surroundings which sometimes requires a short DoF.

o.O


Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.


For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR.

My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2014 02:46
 
24th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Surroundings yes...but I prefer to see whole blooms in focus rather than a couple of petals. That needed f8-11 on the D3/105mm. With DX and compact size sensors that could go to f5.6.



Robert wrote:
Funny that...

Occasionally I even go to the extent of using my 300 f2.8 wide open to reduce the DoF, I usually seek to isolate the flower from it's surroundings which sometimes requires a short DoF.

o.O


Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.


For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR.

My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2014 03:47
 
25th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
I am off to S France on holiday next week and will take the Sony with me it will do all I need and any good pix will give me a pin sharp A3 prints for my local camera club! Hope to post a few images when I get back.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sun Jun 8th, 2014 17:22
 
26th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
The Sony,s chip is quite small at 13.2x8.8mm but this still gives 20.9 Megapixels and produces images like this!

Attachment: PoppySeed0110.jpg (Downloaded 57 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Mon Jun 9th, 2014 04:17
 
27th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
Other info for above: 1/320 sec (windy day but full sun) f7.1 at 47.9mm (in 35mm 130mm) ISO 200 image size 5472X3648. Exposure with this camera: matrix meter is spot on 99% of time. This pix is almost as shot but some unsharp mask was used. Auto focus was aimed 1/3 way in. At A3+ image is pin sharp and I would be hard pressed to see a better print from any Nikon DSLR!

Sorry to go on about this but this is very much what is going on with new lower end cameras today.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sat Jun 14th, 2014 00:28
 
28th Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
Looks like Sony has company ;~)

http://www.gearophile.com/newsviews/1-is-the-new-bottom.html



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Sat Jun 14th, 2014 03:14
 
29th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
Here is the new Panasonic DMC FZ1000 info from DPReview.

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz1000?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=features&utm_medium=sidebar-block-Homepage&ref=features



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2014 11:56
 
30th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
I am enjoying some very good weather in Provence in the South of France. The little Sony is doing well but you will be pleased to hear I am also using the D800. This view of the dramatic Nesque Gorge is with the Sony at full wide the depth of field is very good.

Attachment: Nesque0154s.jpg (Downloaded 40 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 942     Current time is 07:18 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Other Makes of Camera > Sony Bridge Camera DSC-RX10 Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0822 seconds (68% database + 32% PHP). 86 queries executed.