This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Sony Bridge Camera DSC-RX10   -   Page   3 | |
Amazing quality results from a compact camera! | Rating: ![]() |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 05:14 |
|
21st Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800. The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot! I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 14:39 |
|
22nd Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote:I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800. For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR. My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 15:44 |
|
23rd Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Funny that... Occasionally I even go to the extent of using my 300 f2.8 wide open to reduce the DoF, I usually seek to isolate the flower from it's surroundings which sometimes requires a short DoF. ![]() Eric wrote: Graham Whistler wrote:
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2014 02:46 |
|
24th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Surroundings yes...but I prefer to see whole blooms in focus rather than a couple of petals. That needed f8-11 on the D3/105mm. With DX and compact size sensors that could go to f5.6. Robert wrote: Funny that...
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2014 03:47 |
|
25th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
I am off to S France on holiday next week and will take the Sony with me it will do all I need and any good pix will give me a pin sharp A3 prints for my local camera club! Hope to post a few images when I get back.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Jun 8th, 2014 17:22 |
|
26th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
The Sony,s chip is quite small at 13.2x8.8mm but this still gives 20.9 Megapixels and produces images like this! Attachment: PoppySeed0110.jpg (Downloaded 57 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Mon Jun 9th, 2014 04:17 |
|
27th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Other info for above: 1/320 sec (windy day but full sun) f7.1 at 47.9mm (in 35mm 130mm) ISO 200 image size 5472X3648. Exposure with this camera: matrix meter is spot on 99% of time. This pix is almost as shot but some unsharp mask was used. Auto focus was aimed 1/3 way in. At A3+ image is pin sharp and I would be hard pressed to see a better print from any Nikon DSLR! Sorry to go on about this but this is very much what is going on with new lower end cameras today.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14th, 2014 00:28 |
|
28th Post |
amazing50![]()
![]() |
Looks like Sony has company ;~) http://www.gearophile.com/newsviews/1-is-the-new-bottom.html
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14th, 2014 03:14 |
|
29th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Here is the new Panasonic DMC FZ1000 info from DPReview. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz1000?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=features&utm_medium=sidebar-block-Homepage&ref=features
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2014 11:56 |
|
30th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
I am enjoying some very good weather in Provence in the South of France. The little Sony is doing well but you will be pleased to hear I am also using the D800. This view of the dramatic Nesque Gorge is with the Sony at full wide the depth of field is very good. Attachment: Nesque0154s.jpg (Downloaded 40 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 942 Current time is 07:18 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Other Makes of Camera > Sony Bridge Camera DSC-RX10 | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |