This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page  
D800 File Size?   -   Page   6
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 02:45
 
51st Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6969
Status: 
Offline
That seems to follow a similar rationale that drove me to a D800.

I didnt want to have the pain of removing moire if it was seen as I remember there were a few instance in the D1/D1X days of trying to remove moire in Photoshop and it proved to be very difficult without making the image look false.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 07:12
 
52nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4537
Status: 
Offline
To misquote Neil Sedaka...

"The moire I see you...... the moire I (dont) want you"

:rofl:



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 11:59
 
53rd Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
OK... Three to 0 say 800.

I'll cancel the 800e order :-)

Thanks

Tom



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 12:02
 
54th Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
TomOC wrote:
OK... Three to 0 say 800.

I'll cancel the 800e order :-)

Thanks

Tom


Nikon would want you to have one of each Tom!
3:)



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 




Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 12:12
 
55th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6969
Status: 
Offline
TomOC wrote: OK... Three to 0 say 800.

I'll cancel the 800e order :-)

Thanks

Tom

I'd wait for feedback from Ed (before cancelling) as he is the only person I know who has a D800E.
He will have some useful insights I am sure.

The D800 will I think be an easier beast to use.   However it does eat disk space!.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 15:21
 
56th Post
Constable



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 224
Status: 
Offline
Sorryy ... been travelling with limited wlan access.

I've done some side by side tests of the 800 and 800E. In most normal conditions (i.e. printing up to A2 size, no massive cropping9 there is not much to chose. Both give files that are hard drive eaters.

I have had no issues with Moire with either body. The 800E might be the choice for landscape (which I don't do - and is for me the choice for macro where I need to crop).

The 800 is significantly easier to use and is more forgiving. With the 800E you have to really think as if you are using an MF body - BUT an MF body that you can use at higher ISO.

For me the 800E is just about worth it ... I am not sure about birding - i need to borrow JKs 400 2.8, but for most purposes the D800 is good.

Comparison with the D3X is a bit depressing. Handling of the D3X is better (I don't like add on drives for the 800E). Up to ISO 800 there is not much to chose. The D3X is a little more forgiving but you cannot crop so hard.

So I would get whatever is available

Ed

 




Posted: Thu Jun 21st, 2012 17:39
 
57th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6969
Status: 
Offline
Constable wrote:
Sorryy ... been travelling with limited wlan access.

I've done some side by side tests of the 800 and 800E. In most normal conditions (i.e. printing up to A2 size, no massive cropping9 there is not much to chose. Both give files that are hard drive eaters.

I have had no issues with Moire with either body. The 800E might be the choice for landscape (which I don't do - and is for me the choice for macro where I need to crop).

The 800 is significantly easier to use and is more forgiving. With the 800E you have to really think as if you are using an MF body - BUT an MF body that you can use at higher ISO.

For me the 800E is just about worth it ... I am not sure about birding - i need to borrow JKs 400 2.8, but for most purposes the D800 is good.

Comparison with the D3X is a bit depressing. Handling of the D3X is better (I don't like add on drives for the 800E). Up to ISO 800 there is not much to chose. The D3X is a little more forgiving but you cannot crop so hard.

So I would get whatever is available

Ed


Always welcome to come to Valencia to try out the 400 f2.8 :-)



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Jun 22nd, 2012 10:55
 
58th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6969
Status: 
Offline
Well DxO have just published their tests on the D800E.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/06/21/there-is-a-new-dxomark-king-nikon-d800e.aspx/

I'm not sure I understand the DxO ratings and tests but for what it is worth the D800E is one point ahead of the D800.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Jun 22nd, 2012 13:32
 
59th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4537
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Well DxO have just published their tests on the D800E.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/06/21/there-is-a-new-dxomark-king-nikon-d800e.aspx/

I'm not sure I understand the DxO ratings and tests but for what it is worth the D800E is one point ahead of the D800.


Seems like the most meaningless comparison I've ever seen.

o.O



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Jun 22nd, 2012 14:15
 
60th Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
Well DxO have just published their tests on the D800E.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/06/21/there-is-a-new-dxomark-king-nikon-d800e.aspx/

I'm not sure I understand the DxO ratings and tests but for what it is worth the D800E is one point ahead of the D800.


Seems like the most meaningless comparison I've ever seen.

o.O


I keep clicking on the question marks to see if they display any information on how the data was obtained or the test method used, but it just pops up the same window.

Oh, well, the numbers look impressive so I am sure folks will run out right away and lay down hugh amounts of money to get one that is one point over the other. :bowing:



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 211     Current time is 06:47 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D800 File Size? Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0629 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 86 queries executed.