This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Animal photography   -   Page   6 | |
Wild or captive animals | Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 11:40 |
|
51st Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
chrisbet wrote:More good tips, thank you. Well you seem to be doing the right things and yes that's a lot better. A nice portraiture image as opposed to action shot. But for me...not enough depth of field. f8 or even f11 would have got horse head and rider all sharp....assuming you wanted that. As it is, the point of max sharpness is the horses chest. Edit: looking at it again it may just be the whole image needs sharpening. There is a softness that MAY be the lens under performing at its max aperture. Stopping down to 8/11 for some shots should prove or disprove if the lens is letting you down a tad.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 11:55 |
|
52nd Post |
chrisbet![]() ![]()
![]() |
Lol - I was trying to put the background out of focus to make the horse & rider stand out - so I am happy that the in focus part is the horse's chest - exactly what I was aiming for ![]()
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 11:56 |
|
53rd Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
chrisbet wrote:Lol - I was trying to put the background out of focus to make the horse & rider stand out - so I am happy that the in focus part is the horse's chest - exactly what I was aiming for I will get my hat. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 12:17 |
|
54th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Whilst I understand your (correct) use of max aperture for dof effect I would still be concerned about the sharpness of the key areas. This could be the lens as many need stopping down a stop or two to max sharpness....whilst recognising that's contrary to your dof needs it may prove a point about the lens max sharpness potential in a test. It would be my first check if I were trying to get the images sharper. I don't know how much post capture software sharpening you HAVE applied. Maybe not enough. Most images (especially raw files) benefit from 20% extra kick up the rear. You Gimp treatment shows that. I don't think you are doing anything wrong in the execution ...it may just be the equipment is on its limit or you are not doing enough post processing. ![]() ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 13:03 |
|
55th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Welcome to our forum Chrisbet, sound like you have had some good help so far. I like your pictures keep up the good work. I agree with Eric more DOF would have helped to get rider sharp as well on your last posted image. Also you cut off horses feet so would improve a lot with tighter crop showing rider and horses heads only or pull back a bit to show all!
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 13:21 |
|
56th Post |
chrisbet![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote: Welcome to our forum Chrisbet, sound like you have had some good help so far. I like your pictures keep up the good work. I agree with Eric more DOF would have helped to get rider sharp as well on your last posted image. Also you cut off horses feet so would improve a lot with tighter crop showing rider and horses heads only or pull back a bit to show all!Thanks - yes, a few things to think about, especially stopping down a little - or maybe swapping to my prime lens for shots like the last one - often though it is not possible to get close enough to frame the image and swapping lenses quickly enough is impossible. It's a learning curve and your hints and suggestions are most welcome.
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 13:23 |
|
57th Post |
chrisbet![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote: I don't know how much post capture software sharpening you HAVE applied. Maybe not enough. Most images (especially raw files) benefit from 20% extra kick up the rear. You Gimp treatment shows that. 50% ![]()
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2019 08:10 |
|
58th Post |
Iain![]() ![]()
![]() |
A mammal form today,![]()
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2019 11:12 |
|
59th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Three eyed deer.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2019 11:28 |
|
60th Post |
chrisbet![]() ![]()
![]() |
Dear, deer..... four ears and one horn ![]()
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 1633 Current time is 06:08 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Animal photography | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |