This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  ...  Next Page Last Page  
Night Sky Photography   -   Page   4
An Equatorial Mount: My lucky day!  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat Mar 16th, 2019 09:12
 
31st Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
It seems to be moving slightly but there seems to be a window of about six hours of almost clear skies.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sat Mar 16th, 2019 16:39
 
32nd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6975
Status: 
Offline
Lots of flooding up North take care!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Mar 16th, 2019 17:19
 
33rd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Thanks JK, Just been looking at the news, they have called off the three peaks race due to flooding.

I will be at about 350 Metres (about 1,150 feet), but I do have to pass through Broughton Mills, a tiny hamlet with a very tight bridge, a square bend off this tiny narrow hump back bridge, then it goes down to beck level.  If I am going to have a problem it will be there, although there is a splash well up in the hills where the road becomes a river for 50 yards.  Onto the road through one field gate and back off the road through another field gate. I have seen it a foot deep through there.

It will all be gone by tomorrow night. Seathwaite has the highest rainfall in an inhabited area in UK over 24 Hrs and is about a mile from where I go for my night sky photography.

Seathwaite Farm, Cumbria, November 19 2009 – 314mm*
Martinstown, Dorset, July 18 1955 – 279.4mm
Bruton (Sexey's School), Somerset, June 28 1917 – 242.8mm
Upwey (Friar Waddon), Dorset, July 18 1955 – 241.3mm
Cannington, Somerset, August 16 1924 – 238.8mm
Loch Sloy Main Adit, Strathclyde, January 17 1974 – 238.4mm
Long Barrow, Devon, August 15 1952 – 228.6mm
Upwey (Higher Well), Dorset, July 18 1955 – 228.6mm
Bruton (King's School), Somerset, June 28 1917 – 215.4mm
Timberscombe, Somerset, June 28 1917 – 213.1mm
Rhondda (Lluest Wen Reservoir), Glamorgan, November 11 1929 – 211.1mm
Upwey (Elwell), Dorset, July 18 1955 – 211.1mm
Kinlochquoich, Highland, October 11 1916 – 208.3mm
Camelford, Cornwall, July 8 1957 – 203.2mm
Bruton (Pitcombe Vicarage), Somerset, June 28 1917 -200.7mm
Wynford House, Dorset, July 18 1955 – 200.7mm
Otterham, near Boscastle, August 16 2004 – 200.4mm
* Figure recorded by the Environment Agency

There are many recorded high amounts of rainfall in the West Country.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 12:01
 
34th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Well the six hour window collapsed into two much shorter sessions.  Nothing exciting materialised except I became slightly better at setting up!

I have yet to analyse the images but the last set with my 16mm fisheye seems pretty reasonable.  The main thrust if my efforts were to assess the improved alignment of the polar scope, I think it's much better but key to this will be a new solid and adjustable base mount to fit on the tripod and to mount the polar rotary tracker in very accurate alignment with the celestial North Pole.

I have reached the drawings stage, I need to design the details of the adjustments and somehow devise some method of locking the adjustment robustly but without imposing great stress on the mount which will cause it to move out of alignment, the adjustment is extremely fine, accuracy needs to be in the region of 5 arc seconds or better, that means you can barely touch it because even a very heavy tripod will flex that much easily.

It really needs bolting down, to something very solid.  I do have ideas.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 12:27
 
35th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1504
Status: 
Offline
Just an off the wall thought - if you need something that remains perfectly in alignment with the earth's axis, would some sort of gimbal work?



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 12:52
 
36th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6975
Status: 
Offline
Robert, it is now illegal to use child labour so no sending the boys up mountains with predrilled slabs!
  :lol::lol:



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 15:10
 
37th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
LOL, what  about a generator and rock drill?

A helicopter would come in handy...



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 15:23
 
38th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
Just an off the wall thought - if you need something that remains perfectly in alignment with the earth's axis, would some sort of gimbal work?
It's getting the alignment which has to be pretty exact with basic and robust design.  Something like a Wimberly might be OK for the articulation but it has to be rock solid, Wimberlys are not rock solid.

The head I have is supposed to have a 5 Kg payload, but the payload is supposed to be balanced so the motor doesn't slow down uphill or speed up downhill.  Speed has to be consistent 1 revolution per 24 Hrs.  The 300mm lens and D800 weigh about 2.5 Kg so it needs about a 1.5 to 2Kg counterbalance, less then the camera/lens, because it can be hung out on an arm so you get the right leverage without adding too much to the payload.

The design is coming together, I am tempted to make a wood mock up to avoid making a metal one which has a snag.

Just about to process last nights images, this will be interesting...



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 15:52
 
39th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6975
Status: 
Offline
Looking forward to see those images.  I am sure it will be a big improvement.   Problem is that further improvement will be a lot of work for just inch-pebbles.  
Per ardua ad astra!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Mar 18th, 2019 18:19
 
40th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Here you are JK...

Please bear in mind these are not intended to have artistic merit, they are simply the results of experiments and an attempt to learn how to set up an Equatorial mount for photography.  I am learning and making gross mistakes.

These images were made with a Vixen EQ-polar mount and a D800 with 70-300 lens and 16mm f/2.8 fisheye lens.  They were 25 second exposures taken at 26 second intervals - one second gap.  The black spot right of centre must be a spec of dust on the sensor.

The first image was made without the Vixen mount motor running, about 40 exposures.  The bright star to the left near the centre, is Polaris.  You can see how far it is from the celestial polar centre.



This was taken after the initial 40 exposures, I switched the motor on but the setup must have been very wrong.  I think I rotated the polar locating scope the wrong way, I was trying to get Ursa minor aligned but somehow I missed!



This is the two above images in one.



Finally back to Stickle, only a short session with the fisheye. 74 images stacked.  Notice I am much nearer the correct polar centre.  Again, 25 second exposures at f/4.0 for some reason only ISO200, I must have forgotten to re set it for astro, I usually run at ISO 1600.

I need to sit down and set up some dedicated menus for astro photography.



____________________
Robert.

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1677     Current time is 13:33 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Night Sky Photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0708 seconds (70% database + 30% PHP). 81 queries executed.