This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next Page Last Page  
Night Sky Photography   -   Page   7
An Equatorial Mount: My lucky day!  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Wed Apr 10th, 2019 02:54
 
61st Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1506
Status: 
Offline
Thanks - any view on the Unread posts button?

I find that the easiest way to check for new posts.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Wed Apr 10th, 2019 10:01
 
62nd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
This morning afternoon I have processed the images from last night.

Nothing spectacular, I had hoped to try the 300mm but until I get a real handle on the Polar alignment there is no point.

I took these pics with the 16mm f/2.8 fisheye.  The mount is rock solid, well on top of it's job, the adjustments are nice, the right angle finder is good enough. I have established that Polaris is closer to the celestial North than it was in 1985 by about 50%.  I now think I know how to set the Right Ascension (RA) to the celestial 'clock' by aligning Ursa Major with the etched markings in the Polar scope.  Now that I know Polaris is only about 2 degrees from celestial North, that makes the RA adjustment less critical in a sense, although for long exposures with a long lens it does matter, especially if the subject is well away from the pole.

The Milky Way is close to the horizon.

All images taken with Nikon D800 and Nikkor 16mm f/2.8 fisheye @ ISO1600, 30 seconds at f/4.0, taken at 35 second intervals.



This is 20 exposures taken with the polar mount running, stacked in StarstaX. Almost no trailing, the motor is doing the business but it's only a 16mm lens.



And 100% crop...



The next is with the Polar mount turned off.  37 exposures.  And a meteor!



And 100% crop...  Also showing the crop area.



With the 100% crop, you can clearly see that Polaris is nowhere near the celestial pole at that magnification with the D800 resolution.

It's coming together.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Apr 11th, 2019 03:45
 
63rd Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1506
Status: 
Offline
Looking at those photos brings to mind a couple of Douglas Adams quotes :

"Space is big, really big."

and

"The last thing you need is a sense of perspective."

:smilesmall:



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Thu Apr 11th, 2019 03:58
 
64th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Well the latest black hole pictures are interesting. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-47873592



Robert, your next project is.......



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Apr 11th, 2019 04:08
 
65th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1506
Status: 
Offline
Yes - I watched BBC4 last night - very interesting - couldn't help thinking about Robert while they were trying to align 8 telescopes all over  the world to focus on such a tiny target - an orange on the moon I think they said!



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Thu Apr 11th, 2019 08:44
 
66th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Robert, Please can you post a picture of your current setup preferably with the 300mm on the camera so I can see the setup.
I have looked at the manual briefly but everything seems to be driven from the telescope being in place.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Apr 11th, 2019 09:08
 
67th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Yes, no probs, I have it set up outside  now, fine tuning the Polar scope.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Apr 11th, 2019 17:37
 
68th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Doh!  :doh:

Sorry, I clean forgot to take picture of setup, will try tomorrow.  I took the D3300 out specially to make some pix for posting but I was so focused on adjusting the mount that I clean forgot to take pix of it.

I spent all last night outside with the mount, determined to overcome my lack of understanding of the adjustments and practice setting it up.  Part of the problem has been that the Polar scope reticule wasn't adjusted properly.  It's impossible to set the altitude and azimuth if the Polar scope itself isn't set right in the first place.  I had been trying and no matter how hard I tried, I got nowhere.  Going back to basics today I spent time adjusting the reticule in daylight, I now have it set up very close to an optimum setting. It isn't easy because it requires adjustment in two axis with three screws, possible but for very fine adjustments it's not easy, the Allen key is 0.9mm (tiny), I have fitted the Allen key into a small screwdriver handle to make it possible to hold with my arthritic fingers. Four adjustment screws would have been much easier.

I still need to fully understand the time element since it can cause an error from zero to twice the distance between the celestial North pole and Polaris.  As Polaris appears to describe a circle around the celestial North pole, one has to know *where* around that circle Polaris actually needs to be, because that is what determines where the centre of the circle is, it needs to be exactly centred on celestial North, an incorrect time causes an eccentric rotation, it would be exactly right once in 24 hrs.  Difficult to describe, this adjustment is achieved by rotating the Polar scope to the correct angle, like setting a clock, which is correctly determined from periodic tables, by the date and time of day, a bit like tide tables, in fact probably uses the same base calcs.  It can also be determined from the position of Ursa Major but in reality using Ursa Major is only a very rough guide.

The more I use the EQ mount the more I realise how exacting the settings need to be.  Even with modern and very expensive EQ mounts they are only as good as the alignment and support allows.  For really accurate alignment massive foundations and an incredibly solid structure are needed.  A tripod mounted setup is way too flimsy and then add the distortions caused by air movements.

With the practice I have had, I can now get the mount roughly aligned in a few minutes.  For most purposes that's probably good enough to reduce star-trailing to acceptable levels but for what I want I think I will also adopt another technique, rather than making very long exposures, which risk showing star-trail elongation of the image, I will take many relatively short exposures using the EQ mount to maximise the exposures and minimise the elongation.  Because drift is likely over long sessions, using image alignment software will align the images exactly.

My eventual hope is to be able to make pictures of planets, star clusters and nebula, I might eventually get a modest telescope if I find one at the right price.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Apr 12th, 2019 08:54
 
69th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
11 Pictures!  Of the mount...
#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


#6


#7


The original flimsy mount against my solid heavy duty mount.
#8


The DR-3 right angled eyepiece with my adaptor, a bit of plastic plumbing fitting and three thumb screws out of an old Mac.
#9


A somewhat out of focus eyepiece.
#10


#11



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Apr 12th, 2019 09:27
 
70th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6980
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Robert.

I think that I see what is the problem and the issue with some of your difficulties with sighting.

If you want to call me this evening then we can chat it through.
PMed you my mobile number.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1677     Current time is 09:58 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Night Sky Photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0747 seconds (71% database + 29% PHP). 80 queries executed.