| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2 3   |
|
|||||||
| Ness Gardens in Infra Red - Page 1 | |
| A wander round one of my favourite gardens | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon May 21st, 2018 14:11 |
|
1st Post |
Robert
|
But... Not overwhelmed with the results. More to do with the processing than the subject or the photography. No good blaming the gear. It's some time since I took (and processed) any IR photographs. The images straight from the D200 are much nearer than from my old D1, which took a lot of coaxing to life. However, having spent most of the day processing them I just walked away. Not bad but not what I visualised. D200, 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR. Processed in Lightroom and Photoshop with red-green channels swapped by the photoshop built in process, which I have slightly customised to give 3% red to warm the otherwise stark white/grey image. Most of the images are HDR from between three and five exposures depending on the wind/tree movement and the exposure range. Here are a couple of examples:    I would have preferred an ivory off white rather than pink hue.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 03:05 |
|
2nd Post |
Eric
|
I prefer the last shot because the path leads you into the foliage. As you know I am a great believer in the necessity for strong elements in an IR image that are not responsive to IR. The path is a good example. I might have gone further and increased the paths dominance by selectively colouring it. The easiest way with IR is to take an untouched brown copy and place it on a layer over the image. Then erase everything except the path. You get a brown path amounts the white. I would also do a gradient darkening on the sky ....to better frame the top edge.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 03:09 |
|
3rd Post |
Robert
|
Thank you Eric!  Will try that...
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 03:15 |
|
4th Post |
Eric
|
Something like this.. Attachment: 86A0CC8B-45B3-4BBA-8613-4B6086A1057B.jpeg (Downloaded 21 times)
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 03:21 |
|
5th Post |
Eric
|
As we have discussed before, there can be a sameness about IR images that make it harder and harder to motivate oneself to get out and look for the unusual. Witness the fact that image of mine is 8 years old! And I haven't been inspired to do any in 18months or more! However with a holiday on the horizon, you have reminded me I do need to take my Fuji IR with me...and batteries!!! Like a lot of occasions in photography, you don't see images unless you are looking...so maybe I need to look harder!! Thanks for reminding me!
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 06:25 |
|
6th Post |
Robert
|
Something like this? Masking the sky wasn't easy... A lot of hand retouching. Maybe I shouldn't have allowed the blue to fade away completely on the left...
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 07:30 |
|
7th Post |
Eric
|
Robert wrote:Something like this? What do YOU think? Better or not?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 07:41 |
|
8th Post |
Eric
|
Apart from the path and sky, I personally like to have more contrast in the mid tones. So without blowing the highlights or flattening the shadows Ove just boosted mid tone contrast on this copy by 20%. Attachment: A1DE1426-A6A6-4D1F-9A76-D1930D595928.jpeg (Downloaded 21 times)
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 08:09 |
|
9th Post |
Robert
|
Eric wrote:What do YOU think? Better or not? Better but not there yet. Not 100% happy with the sky or the sky masking of the twiglets to the right. The image lacks impact and 'sparkle'. Yet, I felt it was potentially a nice candidate. A cloudless sky would have been easier.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 22nd, 2018 08:19 |
|
10th Post |
Robert
|
Eric wrote:Apart from the path and sky, I personally like to have more contrast in the mid tones. So without blowing the highlights or flattening the shadows I've just boosted mid tone contrast on this copy by 20%. Much better, I had the blacks and whites pretty 'right'. You are correct, the mid tones benefit from more contrast. I have addressed the overall tone of the image but still it lacks the ivory, pale cream tone that I wanted. More work required... It's one thing taking these photographs, the work is in the processing and I haven't used this aspect of Ps for a long time. This was what I loved about Bibble, you could adjust the tones so easily and subtly it was a joy to use, combined with the zone selection like the NIK filter software has it was a doddle to use. In fact I might just try the NIK filters on this... Later, have concrete to mix right now.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1537 Current time is 20:14 | Page: 1 2 3 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Specialised Photography - Macro, UV, IR, Underwater > Ness Gardens in Infra Red | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0631 seconds (64% database + 36% PHP). 83 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0631 seconds (64% database + 36% PHP). 83 queries executed.